[LEAPSECS] Bulletin C and all that
Michael Deckers
michael.deckers at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 25 12:00:36 EST 2015
On 2015-01-25 14:58, Rob Seaman wrote:
> Please let me know about typos, suggestions, etc. Needless to say this
> remains a prototype.
...
> YYYY MM before after encoded crc IP Decoded flags
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1972 1 9 10 f8000a00 f5 248.0.10.245 -> OK 1972 1 10 1 (1, 0)
It would be incorrect to consider the discontinuity of the difference
TAI - UTC at the epoch when TAI was 1972-01-01T00:00:10 as a leap second;
the difference increased by about 0.108 s, not by 1 s. Hence, a timestamp
such as "1971-12-31T23:59:60.2Z" should not be made acceptable.
The first leap second occurred when UTC reached 1972-07-01; the information
about a leap second says something about TAI - UTC both before and after
the date referenced. At 1972-01-01, however, the information can only say
something about TAI - UTC for TAI on or after 1972-01-01T00:00:10, but
nothing (correct) for smaller values of TAI.
Michael Deckers.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list