[LEAPSECS] Actual versus legal duration makes programming hard
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Jun 1 13:36:34 EDT 2015
--------
In message <20150601172537.GC14952 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:
>We need a resolution of the issue so that the out-of-the-box defaults
>can just work without any choices.
I'm happy that you have finally realized why some parties are pushing
for the only resolution on the table[1] which makes that possible:
Stop inserting leap-seconds into UTC.
[1] The not-on-the-table resolution which would also make that possible
is announcing leap seconds with at least 10-20 years advance notice.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list