[LEAPSECS] Actual versus legal duration makes programming hard

Poul-Henning Kamp phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Mon Jun 1 13:36:34 EDT 2015


--------
In message <20150601172537.GC14952 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:

>We need a resolution of the issue so that the out-of-the-box defaults
>can just work without any choices.

I'm happy that you have finally realized why some parties are pushing
for the only resolution on the table[1] which makes that possible:

Stop inserting leap-seconds into UTC.

[1] The not-on-the-table resolution which would also make that possible
is announcing leap seconds with at least 10-20 years advance notice.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list