[LEAPSECS] leap second festivities?

[mike at lumieresimaginaire.com]

No booze.. aargh! Have to make do with monitoring. As one experiment, I
have just installed .8p3 on a BBB to see what a smeared LS looks like.
Seems to be working. Or at least doing something. 

mike at bb2:~/src/python$ ntpq -c rv bb1
associd=0 status=4619 leap_add_sec, sync_ntp, 1 event, leap_armed,
version="ntpd 4.2.8p3 at 1.3265-o Tue Jun 30 16:13:35 UTC 2015 (1)",
processor="armv7l", system="Linux/3.8.13-bone47", leap=01, stratum=2,
precision=-19, rootdelay=0.606, rootdisp=6.423, refid=192.168.1.4,
reftime=d93d6d9a.0ab325f9 Tue, Jun 30 2015 19:33:46.041,
clock=d93d6e92.ea82989e Tue, Jun 30 2015 19:37:54.916, peer=51860, tc=6,
mintc=3, offset=-0.003556, frequency=-30.188, sys_jitter=0.055002,
clk_jitter=0.017, clk_wander=0.005, tai=35, leapsec=201507010000,
expire=201512010000, leapsmearinterval=21600, leapsmearoffset=-171.641 

mike at bb2:~/src/python$ ntpdate -d bb1|grep adjust
host found : bb1.stratum1.d2g.com
30 Jun 19:39:01 ntpdate[9545]: adjust time server 192.168.1.30 offset
-0.175234 sec

We'll see how it goes. 

Le 30.06.2015 15:51, Poul-Henning Kamp a écrit : 

> --------
> In message <37D91CA5-9BB1-45B5-AECF-5BFC08F28968 at noao.edu>, Rob Seaman writes:
> 
>> What are people's plans for the day?
> 
> I'm setting up as much of my usual data collection as I can get to
> work, in order to have and provide test-data for tests of leap-second
> handling.
> 
> It doesn't look like I'll get my VLF sampler running though.
> 
> Previous leapsecond data:
> 
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/Leap/20081231/ [1]
> 
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/Leap/20051231_HBG/ [2]

 

Links:
------
[1] http://phk.freebsd.dk/Leap/20081231/
[2] http://phk.freebsd.dk/Leap/20051231_HBG/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/leapsecs/attachments/20150630/ceeacf57/attachment.html>