[LEAPSECS] Bloomberg announced its smear

[Steve Summit]

Martin wrote:
> I agree that it would be better to have a proper solution for this
> problem, and I believe that Dave Mills' idea to stop the time during
> an inserted leap second, and increment it only by 1 LSB whenever an
> application queries the time would solve most of the problems we see.

I'm glad you mentioned this.  Mills's leapsecond page at
https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/leap.html describes this as if
it's the way it's done in Unix kernels.  Do you know which of
them actually use it?  (Linux seems not to, as you pointed out.)