[LEAPSECS] leap seconds in POSIX
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Mon Jan 27 14:33:37 EST 2020
Steve Summit <scs+ls at eskimo.com> wrote:
> * The leap second drought of 1999-2006 rather nastily coincided
> with a gradual change in the computing industry from "nobody's
> clocks are synchronized that well anyway, so a second here or
> there doesn't matter" to the opposite. (But by the time we
> realized we had a leapsecond problem, it was sort of too late
> to fix it.)
It looks like we're in another long gap, based on the LOD chart and the
UT1-UTC prediction. The current gap is now the second longest...
https://datacenter.iers.org/singlePlot.php?plotname=FinalsDataIAU2000A-UT1-UTC-BULA&id=10
https://datacenter.iers.org/singlePlot.php?plotname=FinalsDataIAU2000A-LOD-BULA&id=10
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Viking: South or southwest 5 to 7, becoming variable 3 or 4 later. Moderate or
rough. Squally showers. Good.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list