[LEAPSECS] LEAPSECS Digest, Vol 153, Issue 3
Demetrios Matsakis
dnmyiasou at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 15 14:35:56 EDT 2020
You have anticipated many of the things that go in to the models! They use their own language of course, like “glacial rebound”.
> On Jul 15, 2020, at 2:33 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk at phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> --------
> Demetrios Matsakis writes:
>
>> rise, and the Earth gets rounder. But the same people who do that math
>> say today's warming, dramatic as it may be for our biosphere, is
>> too little for this particular effect. People have gotten that stuff
>> wrong since George Darwin, though.
>
> I think the basic redistribution of water will be a wash, pun
> intended, for instance the water in the Greenland icecape gets
> lowered some kilometers, but a lot of that water will end up in the
> central pacific, right on the Equator, due to the local gravitation.
>
> If we get a negative leap, it will be because of "noise", both from
> whatever is going on under our feet, but possibly also from climate
> change transient phenomena, the crust under Greenland bouncing up
> under lighter load, ocean current modulations or, more unlikely
> reconfigurations.
>
> But still eyeballing the LOD curve, I'd give it 50/50 before 2038.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list