[LEAPSECS] UT1 offset
Hal Murray
halmurray+leapsecond at sonic.net
Mon Dec 25 03:25:07 EST 2023
>>> ..... Please keep DUT1 less than 100 seconds.
>> They /really/ dont want to ever see a leapsecond or leapminute, do they ?
> I'd love for them to have 6 digits for the offset.. 9999.99.
Why try to make that field big enough? Why not just drop it?
Who uses DUT1 via radio? Who will be using it 50 years from now?
Is it needed for anything other than navigation and astronomy? I assume
astronomers will have a network connection. Do ships listen to WWV or similar
to get DUT1?
How many ships are big enough to need DUT1 for navigation yet small enough
that they don't have GPS?
Another option would be to drop the high digits. Fill them in with firmware
the same way that software now fixes GPS WNRO glitches. (That would take an
extra line of code if you have to go both forward and backward.) 2 digits of
seconds would be good for 50 old-leaps either way. Or you could make it 75
one way and 25 the other...
---------
I poked >Who uses DUT1?< into Google.
It found:
https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/navyls/0907.html
Who uses DUT1?
From: Tom Van Baak <tvb_at_LEAPSECOND.COM>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:18:42 -0700
The by-thread index doesn't show that thread. Google found Steve Allen's
reply.
https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/navyls/0900.html
Re: Who uses DUT1?
From: Steve Allen <sla_at_UCOLICK.ORG>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:31:52 -0700
Both are in the by-date index.
Steve discussed astronomy and navigation.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list