Interesting Issue
Chris Purcell
cjp39 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Dec 9 05:23:35 EST 2004
> Some people have suggested that Markdown should only allow emphasis
> to start and end at the beginning of "words", so that you can use
> underscores mid-word without triggering <em> tags.
That would break, for instance, emboldened quotes, no? *"This is a bold
bit of quoting."*
Perhaps the rule should be "not allow emphasis to start or end in the
middle of words", instead?
i.e. /(\b_|_\b)(.*)(\b_|_\b)/ # works since an underscore character
counts as a word
or /(\B\*|*\B)(.*)(\B\*|\*\B)/ # works since an asterisk does not
count as a word
> But I think
> that's too strict, because sometimes you want to emphasis only part
> of a word:
>
> un*fucking*believable
That should, strictly speaking, be hyphenated
(un-*fucking*-believable), which shrinks the exception category some
more... :)
Cheers,
Chris
More information about the Markdown-discuss
mailing list