Attribute references
    John Gruber 
    gruber at fedora.net
       
    Sun Jan  9 21:22:07 EST 2005
    
    
  
Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote on 01/09/05 at 8:07pm:
> I strongly believe that alternative text is at the right place in front 
> of the image path, because:
> 
> 1.    It is not optional, but required by the HTML specification.
>   By concept, everything inside curly brackets is optional.
> 
> 2.    Alternative text should contains a textual representation of your
>   image. But you can invert things and see the image as a alternative
>   and nicer representation of the text in the alt attribute. Both
>   should be interchangeable.
> 
>   Putting the alt attribute first puts emphasis on readability: you
>   write some text in the document, with a link-like indication of where
>   to find the image replacement for that text.
Right, #2 is pretty much exactly why this syntax is the way that it
is -- the idea is to gently promote the use of good alt text.
-J.G.
    
    
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list