Any news re tables and Markdown?
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
Mon Mar 14 21:59:16 EST 2005
Le 14 mars 2005, à 18:07, John Gruber a écrit :
> This That
> >>>> <<<<
> 12 12
> 123 123
> 1 1
>
> And even then things aren't going to line up visually.
This is why I support the idea of the *optional* pipes. If you write
your table using pipes as column separator, then Markdown use that to
separate columns so you can align cells using the font you want. It
looks like that (A):
| Right | Left | Center | Default |
|------- | ------|----------| ------- |
| 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| 123 | 123 | 123 | 123 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
But since pipes are *optionals*, you can also write it like that (B):
| Right Left Center Default |
| ------ ----- -------- ------- |
| 12 12 12 12 |
| 123 123 123 123 |
| 1 1 1 1 |
Or like that (C):
| Right Left Center Default
| ------ ----- -------- -------
| 12 12 12 12
| 123 123 123 123
| 1 1 1 1
Or like that (D):
Right Left Center Default
------ ----- -------- -------
12 12 12 12
123 123 123 123
1 1 1 1
Now, let's compare each option:
| Table syntax Column separator Font choice Single-column Comment
|
| -------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------- -------
|
| A Pipe (`|`) Any font Yes
Somewhat cluttered. |
| B Character count Monospace Yes
Currently my favorite. |
| C Character count Monospace Yes Lazier
than B. |
| D Character count Monospace No
Single-column table? |
I feel supporting A, B and C would be a good move. A because it works
anywhere, and because some people like pipe separators. B because it
looks clean and uncluttered, and C because it's just like B but a
little lazier, and Markdown always allow laziness where it can.
* * *
In case you didn't notice, the last table I wrote was quite large (88
characters). In fact, I had to expand my email window to write it. This
is exactly this kind of table that leads me to defend a multiple-line
per row variant. Like this one:
| Table Column Single- |
| syntax separator Font choice column Comment |
| ======== ========= =========== ======= ======= |
| A Pipe Any font Yes Somewhat cluttered |
| (`|`) but always work. |
| -------- --------- ----------- ------- ------------------ |
| B Character Monospace Yes Currently my |
| count favorite. |
| -------- --------- ----------- ------- ------------------ |
| C Character Monospace Yes Lazier than B and |
| count less pretty. |
| -------- --------- ----------- ------- ------------------ |
| D Character Monospace No No single-column |
| count table and may be a |
| little confusing |
| with header syntax. |
Isn't this more readable? Beside, now I can write the complete comment
I wanted to write. I think this is important for people who are going
to write tables that contains a little more than numerical data.
* * *
From the first code sample of this email:
| Right | Left | Center | Default |
|------- | ------|----------| ------- |
Noticed how I made possible text alignment in a
proportional-font-compatible way? Instead of counting dashes and
comparing with header, it checks for the presence of one or more spaces
between the header's dashes and the pipes. Space(s) on the right:
right-aligned; space(s) on the left: left-aligned; no space:
center-aligned; spaces on both side: default style sheet alignement.
Now proportional font users can align text in their cells too!
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://www.michelf.com/
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list