Attribute syntax for Markdown

[Yuri T.]

I think ids are a great idea. I don't think it's a good solution for 
footnotes, but I think it's a good idea for other reasons. For me too this 
feature would eliminate 80% of the cases where I use HTML fragments. I would 
add support for it to my [python markdown][1] if there were an agreement on 
this. 

Speaking of which, I ironed out most of the remaining issues, it seems, 
except for the nested brackets (still looking for a non-ugly solution). In 
particular, the link items get their <p> tags now as expected and links 
within headers are supported. I also added support for footnotes and removed 
xml.dom dependency.

- yuri

[1]: http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/


On 9/1/05, A. Pagaltzis <pagaltzis at gmx.de> wrote:

> 

> Hi Uche,

> 

> * Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji at gmail.com> [2005-09-01 18:20]:

> > I'm not on the Markdown list, so I blogged my support of

> > Aristotle's attribute syntax for Markdown. Don't know whether

> > you want to send a pointer to the list.

> >

> > http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005-09-01/Yes___Mark

> 

> the list is CCed on this reply, so that should be that.

> 

> Regards,

> --

> Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

> _______________________________________________

> Markdown-Discuss mailing list

> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20050901/1cae2ffe/attachment.html