Tightening the rules for literal `[` and `]` chars in link ids
gruber at fedora.net
Mon Sep 25 17:14:58 EDT 2006
Jacob Rus <jrus at hcs.harvard.edu> wrote on 9/25/06 at 4:42 PM:
> It has always seemed to me that links should just be
> "[A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9._-]+", and maybe 2-3 other characters, but as few as
> possible. There's no reason for a reference name that no one will ever
> see to have a creative title with lots of punctuation.
I disagree. To date, Markdown's liberal policy on the allowable
characters for link reference IDs hasn't generated any complaints.
Today's stuff about disallowing `[` and `]` is for good reason.
Why would you want to disallow more characters than that?
Spaces, for certain, need to be included. And don't forget
non-ASCII alphabet characters, (é, ü, etc.)
Nor do I see any problem with obscure punctuation in a link ref ID. For example, for this entry on Daring Fireball:
I used the following source:
I can't complain -- I certainly didn't invent the
star-in-circle. If he weren't dead, I'm sure I'd have gotten a
call from [Chuck Taylor][✪] by now.
More information about the Markdown-Discuss