Revisiting mime-types and file extensions
pmocek-list-markdown-discuss at mocek.org
Thu Jun 21 12:35:34 EDT 2007
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:45:08PM +0100, Thomas Nichols wrote:
> Ok -- so your primary profile would be
> and the current spec would have a profile of
> is that correct?
> This would allow us to chop the fragment identifier --
> '#major.minor' -- from the end of a profile, and match it
> or similar.
> If we ever got energetic enough to implement all of this, we
> could then create documents and mark them with mime-type of
Can anyone confirm that having the HTML fragment identifier
formatted as Thomas proposes is valid? Both this [W3C design
issue paper] and [Wikipedia article] suggest otherwise, but
I'm not sufficiently familiar with this to say for certain.
More information about the Markdown-Discuss