spaces and newlines before list markers (was: evolving the spec)
Thomas Nichols
nichols7 at googlemail.com
Sun Mar 2 19:03:22 EST 2008
Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote on 2008/03/02 18:26:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:00 AM, John Fraser <john at attacklab.net> wrote:
>
>> Tightening up indentation rules is definitely a breaking change, and I
>> don't see any payoff for users here. If anything, we should be making
>> indentation rules more lenient.
>>
>
> My only desire is to figure out a way to allow the
> whitspace-before-list-marker and also avoid the more general class of
> "bugs" where a list is triggered by a sentence ending with a number on
> an indented newline.
>
> The reference citation I sent out on another thread is one example but
> anything of the following form will trigger this:
>
> * This is a list item with a hanging indent ending with a number,
> 4. The rest is considered a child of a new ordered list, no matter
> what I do to this paragraph (other than rephrase to get rid of the
> hanging-indented digit+dot).
>
> Which produces
>
> <ul>
> <li>This is a list item with a hanging indent ending with a number,
> <ol><li>The rest is considered a child of a new ordered list, no matter
> what I do to this paragraph (other than rephrase to get rid of the
> hanging-indented digit+dot).</li></ol></li>
> </ul>
>
> Is this something we're comfortable with? If not, can we come up with
> something that avoids this? best, Joe
>
>
Actually, when I first read your example I was confused -- I thought
'4.' was a second-level bullet point, despite the comma on the preceding
line. If a human (admittedly a very tired one) can make this
interpretation, I can live with a Markdown processor making it also.
John's proposed approach in
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2007-July/000690.html
seems to fit well with what a naive (tired) human might expect to
happen. As ever, YMMV.
-- Thomas.
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list