More continuing text for tables
David E. Wheeler
david at kineticode.com
Tue Jun 23 17:04:44 EDT 2009
On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> And here's what I believe you meant:
>
> | Col A | Col B | Col C
> ==+=============+==========+=========
> 1 | A1 | B1 | C1
> --+-------------+----------+---------
> | a2 contains | b2 | c2
> | some long & | b2 | c2
> | interesting | b2 | c2
> 2 | commentary | B2 | C2
> --+-------------+----------+---------
> 3 | A3 | B3 | C3
>
> Which makes me believe my syntax above using explicit line
> separators may be better, even though it's much more verbose.
Yes, Simon's was not quite right. It should be:
| Col A | Col B | Col C
+-------------+----------+---------
| A1 | B1 | C1
| a2 contains | b2 | c2
: some long & : b2 : c2
: interesting : b2 : c2
: commentary : B2 : C2
| A3 | B3 | C3
See also pgsql.
Best,
David
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list