there's no payoff in confusing the users

[Seumas Mac Uilleachan]

On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Bowerbird at aol.com wrote:

> john said:

> >   Have you considered using a PEG instead of regexes?

>

> for all you home-schooled and self-taught programmers

> for whom "peg" is far too computer-sciencey for comfort,

> consider as an alternative the simple methodology i use...

>

> i split the text-file on blank lines and place it in an array.

>

> that is first-cut for my light-markup format, a.k.a., "zml"

> -- zen markup language -- but it's alright with me if you

> markdown people want to borrow it for your own purpose.

>

> i mean, seriously, it's not like i could patent it, or anything.

> (but, on second thought, perhaps i _should_ at least apply.)

>

> then i walk the array, analyzing each item to see what it is;

> the chunk might get tagged as a blockquote, or a heading,

> or a list item, or a plain old paragraph, or _whatever_ it is.

>

> then i walk the array again, using the tag for each chunk to

> generate the appropriate output for the desired format(s)...

>

> (sometimes the tag, or the output, is dependent upon the

> surrounding chunks, and that's the reason i walk it twice.)

>

> it's the methodology of a simpleton, i am the first to admit,

> but it works, and it works well, and it works sufficiently fast.

>

> best of all, for me, is that it's extremely easy to understand.

>

> even better, for everyone:  it's easy for users to understand.

>

> after all, there's no payoff in confusing the users.  is there?

>

> -bowerbird

>

> p.s.  "alright" is a word i like to use...  it's akin to "already"...

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Markdown-Discuss mailing list

> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

What confuses me is what this all has to do with markdown.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20111201/2cb511d2/attachment.htm>