Proposed table specification (long!)

David Parsons orc at
Wed May 11 00:54:46 EDT 2011

On May 10, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Simon Bull wrote:

> Thanks for your additional comments Fletcher.



> If the proposed syntax overly complicated, I am very happy to

> simplify it. The question is whether or not the following is really

> complicated?

Implement what you have, and then you'll have an idea if it's too
complicated. Working code is the best test of the complexity of a

-david parsons

More information about the Markdown-Discuss mailing list