Proposed table specification (long!)

[Seumas Mac Uilleachan]

I thought the topic was a proposed table specification? Like it says in 
the subject line? Somehow it ALL got off-topic.

On 05/20/2011 04:05 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:

> Yeah, let's all get back on topic, 'coz bowerbird said so.

>

> What was the topic again? Oh, trolling on how everyone want to make 

> his own personal markdown spec.

> I've nothing to add than that it's their own decision.

>

> Chris.

>

>

>

> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:56 AM, <Bowerbird at aol.com 

> <mailto:Bowerbird at aol.com>> wrote:

>

>     i said:

>     >   if anyone wants to get back on-topic, i'm game.

>

>     and now i add that if your posts are not on-topic

>     (i'm looking at you, christian), i am _not_ game...

>

>     so don't bother trying to play me.

>

>     -bowerbird

>

>     _______________________________________________

>     Markdown-Discuss mailing list

>     Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net

>     <mailto:Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net>

>     http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Markdown-Discuss mailing list

> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20110520/5172c226/attachment.html>