thomas takes a constructive turn

[Bowerbird at aol.com]

thomas said:

>    The syntax specification for kramdown is complicated, 

>    sure, but trying   to explain the corner cases and 

>    how the implementation handles them is 

>    just not that easy.


great post, thomas.   thanks.

while people all about you are losing their heads, thomas,
you stay cool and collected and on-topic, and consistently
muster up sturdy straightforward fact which i can happily
acknowledge not just as fact, but even as _straightforward_.

explaining corner cases _is_ hard.   factchecker says "true".
no question about that.   ain't it the truth.   even _real_ hard.

and then explaining how you handle those corner cases _is_
"just not that easy", as you put it.   it's just as hard, or worse.
so once again, factchecker says "true" to that statement too.

over the weekend, i can post on the content of your reply,
but for now i just wanted to say "great posts" and "thanks".

-bowerbird
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20110520/f69cc6c9/attachment.html>