Community Group for Markdown Standardization
Boris Le Ninivin
boris.leninivin at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 19:12:48 EST 2012
On 11/21/2012 06:04 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> Le 2012-11-20 à 20:36, marbux <marbux at gmail.com> a écrit :
>> "Every MD implementation would have to have two behaviours, set either
>> by a command line flag, a configuration file, or a preference if used
>> with a GUI. One behaviour would be the individual behavior so that
>> the followers of that implementation wouldn't be left in the lurch.
>> One would be the standard behavior."
>> I think the behavioral switch could be handled automatically if the
>> standardized version has its its own doctype declaration and profile
>> header. If the doc has the doctype declaration, then process the doc
>> as the standardized version of markdown; if not, then apply the
>> implementation's unique default processing.
> If your idea of an improved Markdown is one that starts with a doctype, I'm afraid it won't get very far (with users and implementers alike).
I completely agree with that statment. The power of markdown is that it
is simple and natural. It's not simple and even less natural to put a
doctype. Even a shebang would be too much if markdown is to be spread
among the general public.
More information about the Markdown-Discuss