attribute blocks for definition lists

[Fletcher T. Penney]

Right now, I don't think I would implement this particular syntax.


F-

-- 
Fletcher T. Penney
fletcher at fletcherpenney.net 

On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Matthieu Codron <codronm+markdown at gmail.com> wrote:


> From: "Fletcher T. Penney"

> 

> I'm not sure I want to head down that path yet for MultiMarkdown.  I'm not ruling it out for all time, but I worry about the "cruft" vs "reward" balance.

> 

> I understand your point of view. But I'd like to avoid future implementation divergences ;  so I'd like to hear you about the propoosed syntax : if you were about to implement it in MultiMarkdown, would you adopt this syntax ? I know you cannot give a definitive answer, but at least can you confirm it seems good to you ?

> 

> Thanks

> 

> Matthieu

> _______________________________________________

> Markdown-Discuss mailing list

> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20130718/bfb8eefa/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4899 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20130718/bfb8eefa/attachment.bin>