a case for native bounding asterisk support

[Max Harmony]

> On 03 Jun 2020, at 21.55, Christian Perry <christian at christianperry.dev> wrote:
> 
> And when we're talking about UGC in particular, the other uses of bounding asterisks are much, much, much more common than the urge to emphasize -- yet they depend upon the asterisks being displayed as-is.

While that may be true *within your groups*, I don't think it's accurate *universally*.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1568 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/attachments/20200603/6b0765f0/attachment-0001.sig>