No subject

judicial side of the Accreditation Process. From what I see, DivCom's
participation in the Accreditation Process is that of an additional
conduit of information, which could be vital, if for some reason a
prospective Caucus was having difficulty communicating with the AC due
to cultural differences. 
While I don't view it as an ideal solution, it is the best we're likely
to get at the moment. 

If the DivCom were able to foster greater direct participation of
minorities on the AC, by promoting minorities JOINING the AC, the same
(or better) solution could be had with far less bureaucracy.

David Pollard
GPTx Delegate


-----Original Message-----
From: natlcomvotes-admin at green.gpus.org
[mailto:natlcomvotes-admin at green.gpus.org] On Behalf Of Andy Parx
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 7:22 PM
To: USGP CC
Subject: [usgp-coo] Vote on DivComm proposal

My voting password worked at one time- now it doesn't.

I must vote "NO" on the Diversity Committee (DC) proposal until the
Accreditation Committee is give free reign to do it's job in accordance
with the current rules http://www.gp.org/documents/rules.html .