[meteorite-list] Tunsguska the movie

[Michael L Blood]

Hi Sterling and all,
        Sterling, you are right about my comment. Please accept my apology.
        Agreed: No GW thread!
        Sincerely, Michael
 

on 12/20/07 3:26 PM, Sterling K. Webb at sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net
wrote:


> Hi, Michael, List,

> 

> Michael wrote:

> 

>> If you want a lesson in denial, read the archives on the

>> HUGE number of list members regarding the denial of

>> Global Warming. And this is a list consisting of people

>> WAY above average in both intelligence and educational

>> Achievement.

> 

> 1. PLEASE, nobody start a GW thread. I'm not trying

> to do that. No thread. I'm biting my tongue here, people.

> 

> 2. To state that a scientific issue can no longer be evaluated,

> discussed, or even argued, to imply that individuals who do so

> are mentally defficient or uneducated, to attempt to invalidate

> any reasoned viewpoint that does not agree with your own, is:

>     a) bad manners

>     b) bad judgment

>     c) bad science

>     d) ideological compulsion (otherwise known as -- no,

> wait, I'm biting my tongue...)

> 

> 3. The comment was gratuitious and totally unnecessary

> in a discussion of the 0.7499950384-mile diameter Barringer

> crater. Let's just settle it and call it three-quarters of mile...

> 

> 

> Sterling K. Webb

> (from the deck of my barge

> as I drift down De Nile...)

> ----------------------------------------------------------------

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: "Michael L Blood" <mlblood at cox.net>

> To: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>; "Meteorite List"

> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>

> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:48 PM

> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tunsguska the movie

> 

> 

> on 12/20/07 10:12 AM, E.P. Grondine at epgrondine at yahoo.com wrote:

> 

>> PS - Barringer crater is a mile across, not a

>> kilometer, as I wrote earlier. Thus, assuming neutrons

>> are released in impact, and that this results in

>> higher C14, then from the radio-calibration correction

>> charts Firestone cited, the mammoth peperrer impact

>> crater, should it still exist, should be less than a

>> mile across.

> My understanding is it is much closer to .8 mi in diameter.

> That is a very significant difference in area.

>         Best wishes, Michael

> PS: If you want a lesson in denial, read the archives on the

> HUGE number of list members regarding the denial of

> Global Warming. And this is a list consisting of people

> WAY above average in both intelligence and educational

> Achievement.

> 

> 

> ______________________________________________

> http://www.meteoritecentral.com

> Meteorite-list mailing list

> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

>