[meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 35
Gerald Ascencio
gernbev at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jun 12 10:43:28 EDT 2007
Re. Pix. of the day. Tom has the right idea. The space traveler is more
important than the label! Rock on Tom! (Gerry Ascencio.)
----- Original Message -----
From: <meteorite-list-request at meteoritecentral.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 5:41 AM
Subject: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 35
> Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
> meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> meteorite-list-request at meteoritecentral.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> meteorite-list-owner at meteoritecentral.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Rocks From Space Picture of the Day - June 11, 2007
> (Michael L Blood)
> 2. Has anybody built the GoldPic3 for meteorite hunting?
> (Michael Mazur)
> 3. something else to consider [global warming] (Jerry)
> 4. Alarmists are not new. (GREG LINDH)
> 5. Global Warming (Dave Carothers)
> 6. Iron Vampires from Outer Space! (Darren Garrison)
> 7. Re: Alarmists are not new. (Sterling K. Webb)
> 8. Ensisheim and vacation! (Impactika at aol.com)
> 9. Re: Global Warming and METEORITES (Sterling K. Webb)
> 10. Re: Alarmists are not new. (GREG LINDH)
> 11. Re: Global Warming - Scientifically proven or a farce
> (star-bits at tx.rr.com)
> 12. Rocks From Space Picture of the Day - June 12, 2007
> (SPACEROCKSINC at aol.com)
> 13. givaways,thanks,ebay auctions(AD) (steve arnold)
> 14. AD> French rarities for sale (update) (Pel? Pierre-Marie)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:11:50 -0700
> From: Michael L Blood <mlblood at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks From Space Picture of the Day -
> June 11, 2007
> To: <STARSANDSCOPES at aol.com>, Meteorite List
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <C292EC86.36848%mlblood at cox.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I want to thank ROCKS FROM SPACE
> for tirelessly ? and obviously, thanklessly,
> giving us a daily meteorite photo.
> To complain about something being
> given to one for free seems to me to be so
> rude as to be beyond comment.
> Thanks for the tireless work!
> Best wishes, Michael
>
>
> on 6/11/07 12:08 PM, STARSANDSCOPES at aol.com at STARSANDSCOPES at aol.com
> wrote:
>
>> In a message dated 6/11/2007 10:14:41 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
>> cynapse at charter.net writes:
>>> Good Lord...... another unclassifed meteorite as Picture of the day?
>>> Yawn.
>>>
>>> There should be a rule. No unclassifieds as Picture of the day.
>>>
>>> Don
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> Sorry you're disappointed Don but you know you don't have to view them
>>> if
>>> you choose not to!
>>>
>>> I post what collectors send me and if they want to share with others
>> rather
>>> classified or not I see nothing wrong with it.
>>
>>
>> I disagree entirely with the original post. That's a beautiful
>> meteorite,
>> and
>> saying that it has to be classified to be worth showing is more of the
>> "where it
>>
>> This hobby is about the rocks! I find unclassified meteorites to be, at
>> times, more interesting because there is still mystery left. I like
>> nothing
>> more than a beautiful "different looking" unclassified meteorite. Lets
>> not
>> forget where they all come from and not long ago (15 years?), the
>> meteorite
>> featured in the Picture of the Day would of drawn a lot of interest from
>> nearly
>> all in this hobby regardless of where it was found or if it had been
>> pigeon
>> holed yet.
>>
>> To limit ones interest to only the classified "Hot ticket" meteorites
>> flies
>> dangerously close to Pokemon card collecting. "I have a Bulbasaur!"
>> "Well
>> that's nothing, my Bulbasaur is Base Set!"
>>
>> I'm going back to the microscopes to examine some more mysteries. Who
>> knows, maybe I'll find a Charizard!
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************** See what's free at
>> http://www.aol.com.
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> --
> If You Want a Nation Ruled By Religion, Move to Iran
> --
> Success is not counted by how high you have climbed but by how
> many people you brought with you. ? Anonymous
> --
> I have given two cousins to war and I stand
> ready to sacrifice my wife's brother.
> Artemus Ward
> --
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20070611/0ec93d54/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:14:12 +0200
> From: "Michael Mazur" <mjmazur at gmail.com>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Has anybody built the GoldPic3 for meteorite
> hunting?
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID:
> <cbdefd770706111214v5eb0934cha48eca9ce5bbfe2d at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone has built the GoldPic3 PI metal detector (
> http://home.global.co.za/~trh/) for meteorite hunting. I've ordered a
> couple
> of kits and hope to try them out on a trip in the fall and I was wondering
> if anyone on the list has experience with them. Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Michael Mazur
> Norway
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20070611/c4ad58ce/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:27:05 -0400
> From: "Jerry" <grf2 at verizon.net>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] something else to consider [global warming]
> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <B3FE4B5BE708431BAFE965A70F66B886 at Notebook>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
> reply-type=original
>
> subsequent more current studies
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Shackleton
>
> Jerry Flaherty
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:12:26 -0700
> From: "GREG LINDH" <geeg48 at msn.com>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Alarmists are not new.
> To: "meteorite-list" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <BAY118-DAV132C72AD9C02C4BE9582FBC9190 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> To all,
>
> In view of all the talk about global warming, does anyone remember Paul
> Ehrlich? You know....the great "authority" who wrote the book, "The
> Population Bomb" in the late 1960s. The world was up in arms due to his
> book. There was going to be *mass famine* all over the earth by the late
> 1970s or by the mid-1980s at the latest because of the "inevitable"
> explosion of the world's population. According to Ehrlich, nothing could
> stop it.
> What happened to Ehrlich's vision of our planet?
> What ever happened to Ehrlich?
> Funny how the absolutely "fool proof science" of today is really not
> that fool proof at all.
>
> Greg Lindh
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:17:45 -0400
> From: "Dave Carothers" <david.carothers at verizon.net>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Global Warming
> To: <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <01d001c7ac97$de295b80$6401a8c0 at WINBOOKJ>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
> reply-type=original
>
> I'd like to suggest that this entire thread be taken to a more appropriate
> list:
>
> alt.global-warming
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:24:40 -0400
> From: Darren Garrison <cynapse at charter.net>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Iron Vampires from Outer Space!
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID: <bc4s635dh1m4f1vhb1qtich3nv0c6uo34m at 4ax.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Key quote:
>
> ?This usually happens when a meteorite draws iron from the air,?
>
>
> http://www.dailymirror.lk/2007/06/12/front/02.asp
>
> Sunday night blast ? it was a meteoroid
>
> By Yohan Perera
>
>
> A meteorite explosion in the air above Sri Lanka rocked many areas on
> Sunday
> night and caused panic among people who feared it was another bomb blast
> or air
> attack.
>
>
> The Astronomy Unit of Colombo University and Arthur C. Clarke Centre
> confirmed
> the loud bang heard on Sunday night was a meteorite explosion.
>
>
> According to Colombo University senior lecturer Chandana Jayaratne the
> explosion
> had taken place over Nattandiya and the size of the meteoroid was around
> one
> meter. ?It had exploded in the air, illuminating the night sky,? he said.
> Eyewitnesses confirmed they saw the night sky being illuminated with the
> explosion.
>
>
> The professor said the telephone lines in Andiambalama and Mirigama areas
> had
> undergone disturbance at the time of the explosion. ?This usually happens
> when a
> meteorite draws iron from the air,? he explained.
>
>
> Professor Jayaratne said this was a usual phenomenon as many meteorites
> fall
> throughout the year. The astronomy unit of the Colombo University is
> reported to
> have a large collection of meteorite samples collected from many parts of
> the
> country.
>
>
> Meanwhile Arthur C. Clarke Centre said it had received from many areas
> information on the explosion and the sighting of a bright object streaking
> through the night sky. A Centre spokesman said a moving bright object was
> seen
> from as far as Hambantota. The sound of the explosion had been heard in
> Mirigama, Kuliyapitiya, Bingiriya and Kotadeniyawa, he said.
>
>
> According to the spokesman there may have been a meteorite shower which
> caused
> several explosions. The Centre is to send its research teams to Nattandiya
> and
> Kuliyapitiya areas.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:52:49 -0500
> From: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Alarmists are not new.
> To: "GREG LINDH" <geeg48 at msn.com>, "meteorite-list"
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <051201c7acad$8737cfd0$c3e08c46 at ATARIENGINE>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi, Greg,
>
> Dr. Ehrlich is alive and well and on the faculty
> of Stanford, which he has been since 1959. He is
> head of the Center for Conservation Biology there
> (he's a entomologist, you know, specializing in
> butterflies).
>
> Well, here. Check it out yourself...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich
>
> He could have been completely right when
> he wrote "The Population Bomb" in 1968. There
> were no great results coming from old or new
> food yield genetic technologies despite decades
> of promises, promises. Then it exploded in the
> 70's and continues to do so. Whoops!
>
> He did not believe that technology could get
> you out of all difficulties; some he thought, you
> were just stuck with; you had to accept limitations.
> Of course, he knew people didn't want to hear that,
> but he thought that was because it was an inconvenient
> truth people didn't want to face. In the case of his
> cause, it just appears simply to have not been true.
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GREG LINDH" <geeg48 at msn.com>
> To: "meteorite-list" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:12 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Alarmists are not new.
>
>
>
> To all,
>
> In view of all the talk about global warming, does anyone remember Paul
> Ehrlich? You know....the great "authority" who wrote the book, "The
> Population Bomb" in the late 1960s. The world was up in arms due to his
> book. There was going to be *mass famine* all over the earth by the late
> 1970s or by the mid-1980s at the latest because of the "inevitable"
> explosion of the world's population. According to Ehrlich, nothing could
> stop it.
> What happened to Ehrlich's vision of our planet?
> What ever happened to Ehrlich?
> Funny how the absolutely "fool proof science" of today is really not
> that fool proof at all.
>
> Greg Lindh
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:30:28 EDT
> From: Impactika at aol.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Ensisheim and vacation!
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com,
> COMeteoriteClub at yahoogroups.com
> Message-ID: <c35.161ac84f.339f8974 at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am almost packed and flying off tomorrow morning for Paris and the
> Ensisheim Show, then I will take some vacation time and I am flying back
> on June 27.
> But don't expect to hear from me until the 28th at best.
>
> Right now my Catalog is (almost) up to date and so is the list of
> thin-sections, so if you want to reserve something, or ask a question, go
> ahead send me
> an email, and I will try to answer as quickly as possible, I will have
> access to a couple computers while in France. And of course, I will clean
> up my
> mailbox, erase a thousand or so spam emails and get to the real mail as
> quickly
> as possible when I get back.
>
> Au Revoir!!!
>
> Anne M. Black
> www.IMPACTIKA.com
> IMPACTIKA at aol.com
> President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> www.IMCA.cc
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:42:23 -0500
> From: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming and METEORITES
> To: "Dave Carothers" <david.carothers at verizon.net>,
> <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <052401c7acb4$73de7cc0$c3e08c46 at ATARIENGINE>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi, Dave, List
>
> Too late, Dave; it's already dead and gone.
> There's an occasional snip or comment popping
> up like flotsam after a shipwreck, but the boat
> has sunk. It's long over with. I wrote the most
> and if I never look at another graph, it'll be
> too soon.
>
> I promised a post on Global Warming AND
> Meteorites, and here it is. Back at the turn of the
> last century, one of the great mysteries of science
> was: What kept the Sun hot? We knew then that
> the Earth was quite old (the daring guessed a billion
> years or more!). If the Sun was just a ball of hot
> gas radiating its heat away, why wasn't it cold by
> now? How long would it last? There were lots of
> theories, most of them pretty whacky.
>
> Lord Kelvin gave a speech in which he said that
> "modern physics" was a theory that explained almost
> everything. He excluded the ultraviolet problem and the
> solar heat problem (which would be quantum theory
> and nuclear reactions)) We tackled the problem of the
> Sun, though. It turned out that a ball of hot gas that
> heavy would cool to black in only 25 million years,
> and we knew that was too short a time, so there had
> to be something heating up the Sun all the time.
> What could it be?
>
> METEORITES!
>
> An astronomer named H. A. Newton (who was obviously
> no relation to Sir Isaac!) calculted how many meteors, falling
> in from intergalactic space, it would take to keep the Sun
> from cooling off. All of the kinetic energy of the meteors
> would be dumped into the Sun as heat energy, so he calculated
> back to figure out how many meteors it would take to keep
> the Sun hot. It was a truly gigantic number, millions per day,
> but it was just barely conceivable.
>
> In the 1902 edition of his text on celestrial dynamics, the
> great Forest Ray Moulton wasted two pages gutting Newton's
> theory. He pointed out that some of those meteors would
> strike the Earth as they fell toward the Sun, that you calculate
> how many, and then figure out how much heat they delivered
> to the Earth. If there were as many meteors as Newton thought,
> the ones that hit the Earth would be enough to more than DOUBLE
> the temperature of the Earth, so obviously Newton's meteors
> didn't exist and couldn't keep the Sun hot.
>
> There you have it, METEORITES as a cause of Global
> Warming! The idea of heating by meteorite was not new;
> it had been suggested for the Sun earlier in the 1800's by
> Mayer. But you don't have to feel guilty for your meteorites.
> Don't send the guilty ones to Al Gore! Using Dr. Moulton's
> mathematical analysis I calculate that each kilogram of
> meteorite falling to Earth releases 194,134 calories of heat.
> That's what they used in 1902 -- calories; forget your joules.
> You convert it.
>
> Whatever causes Global Warming, I'm pretty sure it isn't
> Meteorites...
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> ----------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Carothers" <david.carothers at verizon.net>
> To: <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:17 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Global Warming
>
>
> I'd like to suggest that this entire thread be taken to a more appropriate
> list:
>
> alt.global-warming
>
> Dave
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:58:41 -0700
> From: "GREG LINDH" <geeg48 at msn.com>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Alarmists are not new.
> To: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>
> Cc: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <BAY118-DAV25D4A9D2814C88F853C72C9190 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Hi Sterling,
>
> The posing of my question as to what happened to Ehrlich was only to
> point out that his relevance as far as predicting apocalyptic scenarios
> was
> and is nonexistent. The question was mostly rhetorical. I'm aware that
> his
> specialty is butterflies. He would do well to stick to his area of
> expertise. He should stay away from "end of days" stuff.
> "Learned people" are now painting similar dark scenarios concerning
> global warming. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong....only time
> will
> tell.
> My main gripe is that the "global warming intelligentsia", just like
> Ehrlich, are only willing to consider their side. As a matter of fact,
> for
> them, there is no other side. It's their way or the highway. The fact
> is,
> there are other sides to this argument. There are scientists who doubt
> the
> claims of the politically correct, "global warming is caused by man"
> people.
> If I'm to be convinced that man is the cause for a rise in current
> temperatures, it will take a lot more than an "inconvenient crock" by Al
> Gore.
> See, I readily admit that I don't have all the answers. I just happen
> to hate to death political correctness like you wouldn't believe. I think
> so much of today's science is driven by what happens to be "in" at the
> moment and all contrary views need to be suppressed.
> That would seem to lead to really bad science.
> That's the way it seems to me as a nonscientist.
>
>
> Greg Lindh
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "GREG LINDH" <geeg48 at msn.com>; "meteorite-list"
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Alarmists are not new.
>
>
>> Hi, Greg,
>>
>> Dr. Ehrlich is alive and well and on the faculty
>> of Stanford, which he has been since 1959. He is
>> head of the Center for Conservation Biology there
>> (he's a entomologist, you know, specializing in
>> butterflies).
>>
>> Well, here. Check it out yourself...
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich
>>
>> He could have been completely right when
>> he wrote "The Population Bomb" in 1968. There
>> were no great results coming from old or new
>> food yield genetic technologies despite decades
>> of promises, promises. Then it exploded in the
>> 70's and continues to do so. Whoops!
>>
>> He did not believe that technology could get
>> you out of all difficulties; some he thought, you
>> were just stuck with; you had to accept limitations.
>> Of course, he knew people didn't want to hear that,
>> but he thought that was because it was an inconvenient
>> truth people didn't want to face. In the case of his
>> cause, it just appears simply to have not been true.
>>
>>
>> Sterling K. Webb
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "GREG LINDH" <geeg48 at msn.com>
>> To: "meteorite-list" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 9:12 PM
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Alarmists are not new.
>>
>>
>>
>> To all,
>>
>> In view of all the talk about global warming, does anyone remember
>> Paul
>> Ehrlich? You know....the great "authority" who wrote the book, "The
>> Population Bomb" in the late 1960s. The world was up in arms due to his
>> book. There was going to be *mass famine* all over the earth by the late
>> 1970s or by the mid-1980s at the latest because of the "inevitable"
>> explosion of the world's population. According to Ehrlich, nothing could
>> stop it.
>> What happened to Ehrlich's vision of our planet?
>> What ever happened to Ehrlich?
>> Funny how the absolutely "fool proof science" of today is really not
>> that fool proof at all.
>>
>> Greg Lindh
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 0:06:28 -0700
> From: <star-bits at tx.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically proven
> or a farce
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID: <3344545.1181631988737.JavaMail.root at web33>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I am growing weary of this "debate" and since I seem to have the knack of
> ending threads on the rare occasions when I post on them, lets kill this
> one right now.
>
> Global warming isn't a debate it is two sides talking past each other.
>
> Side 1 sees glaciers melting and snowcapped mountains without snow and a
> hundred other anecdotal observations and says global warming is obvious
> even to the casual observer. How can you be so blind as not to notice.
> With 6 billion humans and their hundreds of millions of automobiles and
> other polluting industries it is equally obvious humanity is to blame and
> something must be done IMMEDIATELY to stop this.
>
> Side 2 sees the anecdotal evidence as just that anecdotal. There is no
> smoking gun which says any current climate change is anything other than
> mother nature flexing her muscles. Proponents range from there is no
> global warming, it is just a short term fluctuation, to records show
> numerous times in the past where earth has been warmer than it is now and
> this is just another warm up period. Since the human impact, miniscule or
> great, is not fully understood, taking draconian steps to reduce
> greenhouse gases which will affect global standards of living with no
> assurances of any effect on the climate, is premature. If you don't
> understand the problem your solution may be flawed, too little or too much
> or completely irrelevant. Note side 2 does not deny the anecdotal
> evidence or some climate change, just the conclusions drawn from it. So
> new evidence of warming, which side 1 will scream from the roof tops, has
> little to no effect on side 2 which is looking for solid sci
> entific evidence of what exactly is the effect of humanity on the climate.
>
> Side 1 is more emotional and side 2 more analytical. Neither side will
> credit the the other and will continue to talk past each other until
> mother nature forces a solution on one side or the other. Neither side
> will convert the other at this point so further discussion on the
> "METEORITE!!!" list is not only against list rules, but a waste of time
> and bandwidth.
>
> Lets kill this thread, no posting to the list to tell me how right or
> wrong I am.
>
> --
> Eric Olson
> 7682 Firethorn Dr
> Fayetteville, NC 28311
>
> http://www.star-bits.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:27:12 EDT
> From: SPACEROCKSINC at aol.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Rocks From Space Picture of the Day - June
> 12, 2007
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID: <bbd.19985e27.339fc0f0 at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> http://www.spacerocksinc.com/June_12_2007.html
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
> From: steve arnold <stevenarnold60120 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] givaways,thanks,ebay auctions(AD)
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID: <759664.67887.qm at web57809.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Good morning list.I just want to say thanks for the 8
> freebies that I gave away to all who chimed in.They
> will go out shortly.I also have 2 left I missed to
> ever who chimes in first.They are SAH 99608 and SAH
> 99639.They are the only 2 left for freebies.I also
> have 6 auctions ending today under the ebay
> id,illinois meteorites.Thanks and have a great day.3
> weeks till mexico.
>
> Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
> Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999!!
> chicagometeorites.net.Specializing
> in Gao Meteorites!
> Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:32:10 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Pel? Pierre-Marie <pierremariepele at yahoo.fr>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] AD> French rarities for sale (update)
> To: MeteoriteList <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Message-ID: <528487.67103.qm at web23014.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hello again list,
>
> I wanted to make an update for my sale of french
> meteorites during the Ensisheim show.
>
> Here are the pieces still available :
> - Agen (large)
> - Barbotan
> - Bouvante
> - Chassigny
> - Ensisheim (that's the right place to buy it ;-)
> - Hainaut (wonderful)
> - Henvic (unique)
> - Juvinas
> - Kerilis
> - Kernouv? (12g)
> - Lanc? (rare CO)
> - Montferr?
> - Saint-Germain-du-Pinel (incredibly rare)
> - Saint-Sauveur (french enstatite)
> - Vouill? (5g slice)
>
> Here are a link to the catalog with pictures :
> http://www.meteor-center.com/french_meteorites.pdf
>
> Meet you in Ensisheim but if you're interested in a
> piece at the show, you can hold it from me until the
> show. Payment to be done in euros, preferably in cash
> or from a french bank. Be quick, all will be gone
> quickly.
>
> I will also be selling great pieces (non french) at
> the show (including a mindblowing Millbillillie
> slice).
>
> Regards
>
> Pierre-Marie PELE
> www.meteor-center.com
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo!
> Mail
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> End of Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 43, Issue 35
> **********************************************
More information about the Meteorite-list
mailing list