[meteorite-list] Re-2: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - July 19, 2008

[Mike Jensen]

Hi Bernd
Yes I saw both of those abstracts. Unfortunately abstracts carry
almost no weight as they are not peer reviewed. So the most correct
classification based on the original work would be a Eucrite. Though
ultimately I would strongly suspect they are correct and in the future
it will be Eucrite anom. In any case it is not a achondrite anom.

-- 
Mike
--
Mike Jensen
Jensen Meteorites
16730 E Ada PL
Aurora, CO 80017-3137
303-337-4361
IMCA 4264
website: www.jensenmeteorites.com

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:17 PM,  <bernd.pauli at paulinet.de> wrote:

> Hi Fabrice, Mike and List,

>

>

> Mike wrote: "The text list this stone as a ACHANOM or achondrite anomalous.

> But if you look it up in the MB database it is listed as a Eucrite ... So you could

> have Eucrite anom ..."

>

>

> YAMAGUCHI A. et al. (2003) An anomalous eucrite, Dhofar 007, and a possible genetic

> relationship with mesosiderites (Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIV (2003) 1377.pdf).

>

> YAMAGUCHI A. et al. (2006) An anomalous eucrite, Dhofar 007, and a possible

> genetic  relationship with mesosiderites (MAPS 41-6, 2006, 863-874).

>

> Best,

>

> Bernd

>

> To: meteoriteplaya at gmail.com

>    michael at spacerocksinc.com

> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

>

> ______________________________________________

> http://www.meteoritecentral.com

> Meteorite-list mailing list

> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

>