[meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'

tracy latimer daistiho at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 3 19:00:07 EST 2009



We have an accepted cosmic airburst event in recent history -- has anyone found substantial numbers of nanodiamonds as a result of Tunguska? If (compared to 'normal' background quantities) more were found in that area and could be linked to the airburst/impact, that would help substantiate nanodiamond deposits as an indicator. For that matter, what about comparing it to other confirmed mega-impact areas? Do the impactite layers also contain elevated levels of iridium? There are other markers that could bolster this theory.

Tracy Latimer

----------------------------------------

> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:27:52 -0800

> From: epgrondine at yahoo.com

> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'

>

> Hi -

>

> Dr. Morrison is being disingenious. If you have a fragmented comet, and we've all seen them, then you end up with multiple comet fragments hitting - and we've all seen that as well.

>

> I wonder what year the impactite layer from Sandusky with the blast killed mega-fauna will actually get reported

>

> E.P. Grondine

> Man and Impact in the Americas

>

>>Well balanced with an edge to the sympathetic.

>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7808171.stm

>

>

>

>

>

> ______________________________________________

> http://www.meteoritecentral.com

> Meteorite-list mailing list

> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

_________________________________________________________________
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008


More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list