[meteorite-list] 'Chevrons' Are Not Evidence Of Megatsunamis

[E.P. Grondine]

Hi Sterling - 

The best recent impact mega-tsunami data is several feet of sterile
"marine sediments" between occupation levels.

E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas

--- On Fri, 5/1/09, Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net> wrote:


> From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>

> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 'Chevrons' Are Not Evidence Of Megatsunamis

> To: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

> Date: Friday, May 1, 2009, 4:40 PM

> E.P., Paul, List,

> 

> First, geology has a proof for everything, no

> matter how contradictory. Bortz and the

> Scablands, Wegener and Drift, "Strata"

> Smith and, well, strata. Takes a lifetime

> (literally) for truth to out. Not to mention

> how long it took for the existence of impacts

> to be accepted (50-60 years) by geologists.

> We still though the Moon was all volcanic

> surface features right up to the moment

> we got there. Duh.

> 

> Second, rationization and models are not

> enough. That's why Reality has to count.

> 

> Simple test. "Chevrons" have to be aligned

> (within some margin of error) with a crater

> or impact site in water or other event like

> massive mass-slip. Accumulate evidence of

> both. Assume margin of error of ten degrees

> in alignment (or pick your own figure). If

> you find 36 candidate chevrons and only

> one aligns with an impact or other causitive

> site, then the two are absolutely not connected.

> 

> Of course, it's not that easy. Not all craters

> get found, not all tidal waves have a crater but

> another cause (seismic, mass-slip), but if more

> than 4 to 7 are aligned, the odds are many

> (most, some, you pick) chverons are indicators

> of such events.

> 

> Takes a long time and the accumulation of lots

> of evidence, more than we have now, probably.

> Time (but not geologic time) will tell.

> 

> 

> Sterling K. Webb

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

> ----- Original Message ----- 

> From: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>

> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>

> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:58 PM

> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] 'Chevrons' Are Not Evidence

> Of 

> Megatsunamis

> 

> 

> >

> > Hi Paul, all -

> >

> >

> > A rather cryptic article, but then one might think

> that these 

> > researchers may have considered another hypothesis,

> that yet another 

> > impact mega-tsunami occured.

> >

> > I suppose this belongs with Keller's latest results as

> well.

> >

> > But then denial is not simply a river in Egypt.

> >

> > E.P. Grondine

> > Man and Impact in the Americas

> >

> >

> >

> > ______________________________________________

> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com

> > Meteorite-list mailing list

> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com

> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

> 

> 

>