[meteorite-list] Bolide? Doggone?

[Darryl Pitt]

Hi Richard,

I appreciate your thoughts and your analysis could very well be spot  
on---but low resolution and soft focus at infinity are not distortions  
of the sort to which you allude, and I think I'll hold fast to the  
notion of a "bolide by camera-phone" being able to evoke a sun dog.

I suppose in the end I just have a bit more faith in the report of a  
ball "speeding across the sky".....

....and of course I agree that embellished eyewitness accounts can be  
problematic (along with my misplaced faith)

  ;-)    Oh well.


And all best / Darryl




On Sep 1, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Richard Kowalski wrote:


>

> --

> Richard Kowalski

> http://fullmoonphotography.net

> IMCA #1081

>

>

> --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Darryl Pitt <darryl at dof3.com> wrote:

>

>> From: Darryl Pitt <darryl at dof3.com>

>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Bolide?  Doggone?

>> To: "Richard Kowalski" <damoclid at yahoo.com>

>> Cc: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>

>> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 11:09 AM

>>

>> Hiya,

>>

>> If the description of the object's transit through the sky

>> is

>> accurate, I would have to disagree.

>

> I would too, but it's an embellishment to make his story interesting.

>

>> (As the resolution of the camera is weak, and focus

>> limited, a bolide

>> could readily blur into a sun dog-like appearance.)

>> /d

>>

>

> Nope, if that were true the entire image would show the distortions.

> If you look at the images on the wiki page, or google sun dogs and  

> click on images you'll see many examples that look exactly like this  

> one.

> It is an *extremely* common phenomena...

>

> Almost no one looks up any longer, so even the most common phenomena  

> are unknown to just about everyone. I highly recommend _The Nature  

> of Light and Colour in the Open Air_

>

> http://tinyurl.com/no2ej9

>

> It's a great book. I've witnessed nearly everything contained within  

> its pages.

>

> Richard

>

>

>