The Cost Savings of Steam Today.
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Mon Jan 14 14:12:36 EST 2008
Gentlemen:
Check out "Green River Formation" Shale Oil deposit in Colo area. U.S. has
enough oil (how be it in the shale) to be completely self sufficient from
the Arabs right now, not including the coal under our soil and solar
collection and wind turbines for simple electrical production for the
entire population of the U.S.
Fed's need to mandate the shifting of electrical production out of the
hands of the few power company barons and allow home production and green
solutions. Major presentations on the Discovery and Science channels over
the last 12 - 18 months. The technologies exist right now.
w/ $100 per barrel, it is now very cost effective to go after these solutions.
China and Russia can slug it out between themselves and the Arabs.
Eric
At 01:00 PM 1/14/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>Ed Sproles
>
>You are right that the "experts" have been saying for decades "we're
>almost out of oil". There are some big deposits out there that are just
>coming on line (Sakhalin, Russia, with more oil and gas than the North
>Slope of Alaska, for example). And I don't know if its "good news" but
>Russia has more oil and gas than the entire middle east, just a "little
>bit" harder to get out of the ground.
>
>Ed Svitil
>----------
>Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:54:00 -0500
>Subject: Re: The Cost Savings of Steam Today.
>To: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
>From: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
>
>Most published information indicates that the world will run out of
>readily recoverable oil in the next 25 to 50 years. However, this has
>been the story for the past century, indicating that we constantly find
>ways to recover deposits that were not considered practical to recover in
>the past. There are also new discoveries, but the "experts" claim that
>all the really big deposits have been found.
>
>these estimated generally do not include oil in tar sands and oil shale,
>both of which hold vast amounts of oil. the Canadians are recovering
>about a million barrels a day from tar sands, not an insignificant
>amount. Oil shale, located in Colorado and other places, is said to hold
>much more oil than the Saudis have, but we have no commercial process to
>recover it at present.
>
>Coal deposits are said to be adequate for several centuries of consumption.
>
>Ed Sproles
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>NW Mailing List
>To: <mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>NW Mailing List
>Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 5:54 PM
>Subject: Re: The Cost Savings of Steam Today.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Just one question....
>
> Has anyone compared the current supply of crude oil and the approximate
> depletion of such to the amount of coal underground and how long it is
> estimated to last?? We ain't burying dinosaurs anymore.
>
>Gary Price
>Keeping the ole' N&W safe...one tie at a time
>Looking for last minute shopping deals?
><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping>Find
>them fast with Yahoo! Search.
>
>
>----------
>________________________________________
>NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
>To change your subscription go to
>http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
>________________________________________
>NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
>To change your subscription go to
>http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20080114/f336be0f/attachment.html>
More information about the NW-Mailing-List
mailing list