N&W's Use of PL-2 Position Light Signal Equipment

[NW Mailing List]

Abram
  
 A couple things . The N&W used the PL 3s and a lot of them are still out there.
also the spider for the PL 1s was a different breed than the later PL2s&PL3s although they
will interchange somewhat 

Larry
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: NW Mailing List 
  To: N&W Mailing List 
  Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 11:40 PM
  Subject: N&W's Use of PL-2 Position Light Signal Equipment


  There were only two major customers for Union Switch & Signal Company's Position Light Signals, the N&W and the PRR.  



  There were three different generations of PL signal equipment: the original PL-1 equipment which came out in the early 1920s, the PL-2 version dating from the 1930s, and the PL-3 equipment of the 1940s and 1950s.  The difference in the three generations of equipment was the optical systems employed in the individual lamp housings... all the signal mounting hardware remained the same through all three generations of equipment.



  The N&W was buying PL-1 equipment in the 1920s, by the 1940s had switched to the PL-2, and never appears to have used the PL-3.  The PRR, on the other hand, widely installed the PL-1, then switched directly to the PL-3 and never appears to have utilized the PL-2.  I always wondered why the N&W never upgraded to the latest PL-3 refinement, and why the PRR never used the PL-2.



  Recently I completed restoration of one each of the PL-1, PL-2 and PL-3 lamp housings, and mounted them vertically for display, and I think the reason the N&W never bought PL-3 equipment has become apparent.



  Using 9 volt 12 watt signal precision lamps in each, with all housings equipped with standard amber "NoViol" ("no violet") glass, and all juiced at 5.6 volts, there are easily observed differences in the light-emitting properties of the threee generations of equipment.



  1.  The PL-1 lamps system gives what was probably a respectable light in the early 1920s - it certainly was better than the light provided by a semaphore signal.



  2.  The PL-2 equipment (which was N&W's second-generation of Position Light Signal equipment,) with its revised optical system, gives a brilliant light, significantly better than the old PL-1, and the lens was engineered with  a horizontal band of ribbing across the middle portion of the inside of the lens to provide a wide "spread" of light from side to side.


  3.  The PL-3 equipment (which appears to have been bought by only the PRR,) has an optical system which gives an ENORMOUSLY brilliant light, a light which indeed "burns the eyeballs," even when the lamps are burned at 40% below rated voltage.  However, the pencil-beam of light is significantly concentrated and there is no attept to "spread" it from side to side.



  Now granted these are close-up observations and do not replicate the 2,500-3,000 range expected from a working signal in the field, but I think they answer the question why the N&W never bought the latest version of PL signal equipment.  The PL-2, with its "spread," was the perfect signal for a railroad with significant curvature problems, and the PL-3 equipment was the perfect signal for the PRR.



  During my restorations, I photographed the optics and dead-on front views of each version of the PL equipment while illuminated during darkness, and as soon as I go through all the historical and technical material again, will assemble the data, the photographs and the conclusions into a PDF, and offer it to anyone who cares to read it.



  One final test remains.  The next time Mrs. Boss goes away for a few days, I shall rent a "fog machine," fill the basement up with fog, and observe the relative "fog penetrating" characteristics of the PL-2 vs. PL-3 equipment !



  Do the N&WHS Archives contain any material relating to tests and/or purchases of  PL-2 signal material?



  -- abram burnett


  ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  The wise philosopher Theocritus was asked which
  animals of the forest are most to be feared.
  Theocritus responded:  "While in the hills are lions
  and bears, yet in the city are tax collectors and
  lawyers and sycophants, and the latter are much more
  dangerous than the former.  The beasts are
  irrational.  Man calculates his wrongs."
  ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ________________________________________
  NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
  To change your subscription go to
  http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
  Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
  http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20120423/70e67004/attachment.html>