Getting History right! An Editorial

[NW Mailing List]

There is no reason that an errata sheet (or more than one if necessary) cannot appear here on the list! Barney BarnierWinston Salem, NC

---------- Original Message ----------
Return-Path: <nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org>
Received: from mx06.dca.untd.com (mx06.dca.untd.com [10.171.44.36])
 by maildeliver02.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABJQKWTEABQWQ3J
 for <barneyb49 at juno.com> (sender <nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org>);
 Wed,  2 Jan 2013 16:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: mx06.dca.untd.com; DKIM=NONE
Received-SPF: None
Received: from six.pairlist.net (six.pairlist.net [209.68.2.254])
 by mx06.dca.untd.com with SMTP id AABJQKWTDAS58WAS
 (sender <nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org>);
 Wed,  2 Jan 2013 16:34:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from six.pairlist.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by six.pairlist.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614F4140;
 Wed,  2 Jan 2013 19:34:42 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: NW-Mailing-List at lists6.nwhs.org
Delivered-To: nw-mailing-list at six.pairlist.net
Received: from colima.pair.com (colima.pair.com [209.68.4.177])
 by six.pairlist.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 68969164
 for <NW-Mailing-List at lists6.nwhs.org>;
 Wed,  2 Jan 2013 19:06:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 29607 invoked by uid 3021); 3 Jan 2013 00:06:53 -0000
Delivered-To: nwhsweb-nwhs:org-nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Received: (qmail 29604 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2013 00:06:53 -0000
Received: from mailwash32.pair.com (66.39.2.32)
 by colima.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2013 00:06:53 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mailwash32.pair.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4667410A732
 for <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 19:06:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net
 (elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69])
 by mailwash32.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153FE10A72F
 for <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 19:06:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [208.72.76.42] (helo=[192.168.1.2])
 by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67)
 (envelope-from <jim.stapleton at mindspring.com>) id 1TqY9n-0002Ml-5N
 for nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:55:35 -0500
Message-ID: <50E4C8F4.4060200 at mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:55:32 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Subject: Re: Getting History right! An Editorial
References: <27fbb.1f077072.3e15ecaf at aol.com> <50E4ACEC.6000406 at ntelos.net>
 <000d01cde93f$0d0ed620$272c8260$@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <000d01cde93f$0d0ed620$272c8260$@comcast.net>
X-ELNK-Trace: e6701d20515cf44f9697d0dc85d873e7d4c20f6b8d69d88868e0cd313c0eb97ec1cb86ef1e168fd02c4532c24b597639350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 208.72.76.42
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:34:40 -0500
From: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
X-BeenThere: nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0531555481=="
Sender: nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org
Errors-To: nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org
X-UNTD-BodySize: 15817
X-UNTD-SPF: None
X-UNTD-DKIM: NONE
X-ContentStamp: 30:15:1409112070
X-MAIL-INFO:4c05ed384809b5f10dac2549314d0dace889d5b139e98c792988f89c7d29ed08557d6508000811012d49f9c141998db8d8e19941
X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 209.68.2.254|six.pairlist.net|six.pairlist.net|nw-mailing-list-bounces at nwhs.org
X-UNTD-UBE:-1


IMHO
 
 a]  Jimmy is right that the society has a responsibility to correct errors in subsequent printings of Society publications
 b]  Frank is right that we have to watch expenditures at the project level.
 c]  and Alex got here first with what I was going to propose ... THE ERRATA SHEET
 
 I can tell you that I have purchased NEW books from PRRH&TS that had errata sheets with initial distribution of a book, so there is plenty of precedent for this solution.  It is cost effective but meets the intent of "fixing errors and omissions".
 
 d]  If the society does not choose to do an errata sheet, then I am much more in Jimmy's camp.
 
 Jim Stapleton
 ====================
On 1/2/2013 6:15 PM, NW Mailing List wrote:
<![endif]--><![endif]-->While I am not the one who replied to your question I might offer a little insight.
 
First, we don&rsquo;t have the original proofs to correct. The reprint is being done by scanning the original. The goal is to get the book back into print for those members who ask about it
 
Second, If there are errors that you think need to be corrected please provide them and it may be possible to include an errata sheet with the reprint after we review your suggested correction with the author.  
 
Third, it is not about changing a few letters once a book is printed and with hardbacks the fixed cost before you print the first book are 2 to 3 thousand dollars. The fixed cost of scanning a book for reprinting runs into the hundreds of dollars. The question becomes do you nothing or do you attempt to offer your members something at a low cost.  
 
Fourth, the NWHS doesn&rsquo;t stuff very much money into its pockets.  What it does is concentrate on keeping costs low and not raising membership dues. Generally we have about a 2% profit each year (about $4,000)  that goes to keeping the archives functioning. 
 
You may send your suggested corrections to aschust2 at comcast.net and I will let you know the outcome of your suggestions. 
 
Alex Schust
 
 
 
From:On Behalf Of NW Mailing List
 Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 4:56 PM
 To: NW Mailing List
 Subject: Getting History right! An Editorial
 
    I must say that the reply to my question about not making corrections to the Shenandoah Di.v book struck a nerve in me. Why, some of you may ask? I guess in my naive mind it is because I thought we were FIRST a Historical Society! I thought we were a non-profit organization. I guess I was hoping that getting history right, or at least trying to, took precedence over stuffing money in our pockets. The flippant reply to my question, by who knows who, appears to have proved me wrong on all counts.
     Did anyone even ask if any changes needed to be made? That begs a question for the bean counters, just how much extra would it cost to change a few letters? Would it cost as much as say a "Hardback" edition?
     I am very disappointed in the direction the N&WHS has taken in this matter.
 
 Jimmy Lisle
 
 On 1/2/2013 3:03 PM, NW Mailing List wrote:
Due to the small printing with high costs, correction are not possible. This will be a direct reprint with the exception of having a soft cover. However corrections are welcome to be posted to this list.
 
NWHS Commissary
 
 
In a message dated 1/2/2013 12:10:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org writes:
Is it too late to correct some errors in book before it goes 
 back into print?
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20130103/348ff280/attachment.htm>