N&W Boxcar pre-1963 paint scheme question
    NW Mailing List 
    nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
       
    Wed Mar 13 11:37:15 EDT 2013
    
    
  
I certainly didn't mean it that way. The new Athearn is pretty good at 
what it does. What it doesn't do is keep a stock of anything
(you need normal stuff like 40 & 50 foot box cars!) and a decent (not 
great) $50 loco. I don't make a living
selling stuff to the expert builders and rivet counters. I make my 
living selling to dad and his kids. I miss that old $35 F7!
I replaced many a dead 4 oz Tyco with it.
I know that no version of Athearn is big. But there are things about the 
scale train business that does drive me nuts.
Tom Cosgrove
On 3/13/2013 1:49 AM, NW Mailing List wrote:
> >The old Athearn no longer exists. After old Irv >passed, the family 
> sold it to Horizon Hobby.
> >No one cares...
> Please, the current Athearn gets things right far more often than the 
> old Athearn.  And in  my opinion, they are TOO sensitive to what 
> modelers think, and are afraid to make mistakes because of the 
> armchair businessmen out there (including on here), and have refused 
> to do "close enough" production runs that would satisfy most people, 
> because a few people might jump all over them.  But if you're happy 
> with the same old F7s and 40' boxcars painted for every railroad under 
> the sun, fine, bring back the "old" Athearn.
> As for the brave soul who made this anonymous bash:
> >What?  A big company like that with a picky customer >base makes a 
> production run based on one >overexposed photo?  Seems hard to 
> >believe....someone from Athearn should chime in here.
> >Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
>
> First, there are no big companies in model railroading.  Most employ 
> far less than 100 people, small by any standard.
> Second, what's wrong with a manufacturer making a model based on a 
> photograph in a book? If the photograph was so obviously overexposed, 
> shouldn't the book's author and publisher have included a note in the 
> caption that the color is actually brown, not black?  If I am a 
> manufacturer or novice modeler, with no in depth knowledge of a 
> railroad's paint schemes, I look at the that photograph and say the 
> car is black.
> Athearn made an honest mistake, and is far from the worst or most 
> puzzling one ever commited. At least there is an explanation for it.  
> They can't afford to employ experts for every railroad, nor take the 
> time to run every project by the appropriate historical societies, 
> especially if they want to keep it a secret until it is released.  We 
> should be pleased that they are willing to invest in the equipment 
> guides, and do our best to ensure that the publications put forth the 
> most accurate information possible.
> Marty Flick
>
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* NW Mailing List <mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
>     *To:* NW Mailing List <mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:39 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: N&W Boxcar pre-1963 paint scheme question
>
>     The old Athearn no longer exists. After old Irv passed, the family
>     sold it to Horizon Hobby.
>     No one cares...
>
>     Tom Cosgrove
>
>     On 3/10/2013 10:08 AM, NW Mailing List wrote:
>>     What?  A big company like that with a picky customer base makes a
>>     production run based on one overexposed photo?  Seems hard to
>>     believe....someone from Athearn should chime in here.
>>
>>     Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
>>
>>     ----- Reply message -----
>>     From: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
>>     Date: Sat, Mar 9, 2013 9:53 pm
>>     Subject: N&W Boxcar pre-1963 paint scheme question
>>     To: <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
>>
>>     I can remember my local Hobby Shop owner talking about this
>>     particular car. The Athearn Rep had stopped by the store and
>>     discussed this model. Athearn had made the model black based on
>>     what they saw in the picture. The Owner told the Rep that the car
>>     was actually boxcar red  and that the lighting in the picture
>>     gave it there black look. Looking at the photo in the book,
>>     around the door, the color is definitely of a brown hue. Alan Cox
>>     In a message dated 3/9/2013 6:45:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
>>     nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org writes:
>>
>>         The N&W had a paint scheme used on boxcars before the
>>         half-moon logo scheme.  It was the pre-1963 scheme that had
>>         the Norfolk and Western roadname spelled out in capital Roman
>>         style font lettering in white or silver, w/ N&W reporting
>>         marks & car number on the other end in Roman font.  Some of
>>         the cars had silver doors some did not.   My question is,
>>         were these cars ever BLACK, or were they only the
>>         brown/boxcar red in this particular paint scheme?    I looked
>>         at a friend's copy of the N&W Color Guide, and an example of
>>         this scheme in question is on page 39 of a combo door 50'
>>         boxcar. In the pic, the boxcar looks almost black, but I
>>         think it's actually dark brown, in a dark pic.  Did N&W ever
>>         paint boxcars w/ that paint scheme in black?
>>
>>         Athearn made this exact car in HO but it is in BLACK, and I
>>         want to make sure they were accurate on this- they tend to do
>>         a lot of wrong things in HO.
>>
>>         - Moderator (email question from non-mailing list person)
>>
>>
>>         ________________________________________
>>         NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
>>         To change your subscription go to
>>         http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>>         Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>>         http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
>>
>>
>>
>>     ________________________________________
>>     NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
>>     To change your subscription go to
>>     http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>>     Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>>     http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
>
>
>     -- 
>     Tom Cosgrove
>     Past Captain RBVFA Squad, EMT-B
>     N2VFK
>     SKYWARN Spotter LME002
>     Red Cross Disaster Volunteer since 1995
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     ________________________________________
>     NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
>     To change your subscription go to
>     http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>     Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>     http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     No virus found in this message.
>     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>     Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6164 - Release Date:
>     03/11/13
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
-- 
Tom Cosgrove
Past Captain RBVFA Squad, EMT-B
N2VFK
SKYWARN Spotter LME002
Red Cross Disaster Volunteer since 1995
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20130313/2e71af7f/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the NW-Mailing-List
mailing list