Signals at interlockings part 2

[NW Mailing List]

Jimmy,
I'm assuming intermediate signals are "intermediate" to interlockings, so
is this another way of saying block signals or are there other nuances?
Jim Cochran


On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:24 PM, NW Mailing List
<nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>wrote:


>  On 8/13/2013 11:21 AM, NW Mailing List wrote:

>

> For an Eastbound train approaching this bracket on the main, the normal

> block aspects are needed (clear, approach and *stop and proceed*) to give

> information about subsequent block occupancy.  Since this train is

> physically constrained to proceed along the main, no diverging aspects are

> needed, but since a Westbound train could be approaching to enter the

> siding, the stop and stay aspect is needed.

>

> Jim,

>     You can't do that. Only intermediate signals can be stop and proceed.

> So, this has to be a Stop signal.

>

> Jimmy Lisle

>

> ________________________________________

> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org

> To change your subscription go to

> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list

> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at

> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20130813/fb779ce6/attachment.html>