Restoration candidates
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Mon Dec 23 09:36:04 EST 2013
>From Richard Hood
It has cost Southern Locomotives Ltd £750,000 ($ 1.2m) to restore Battle
of Britain class 4-6-2 Sir Keith Park. Not a large engine by US standards
and from a class that SLL are experience, owning 4 others. England has
many specialist restores of steam engines where the US unfortunatley has
few. I would think to restore a Y6 to running condition would cost in
excess of $3m. If new cast frames were required it may not be possible
even at any price. We have a number of foundary's currently capable of
casting loco cylinders and wheels., but the frames for later Y's are
someting else.
Merry Christmas,
Richard Hood, England
On 21 December 2013 20:25, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
> Everything that has been said about restoring locomotives is correct, it
> costs a lot of money and there are a lot of inspections to go through.
> If you watch American Restoration on the History channel, when someone
> brings in a pedal car for restoration, it costs almost $5000 to restore the
> piece and it only cost $50
> new. Talk to anyone that restores old cars, buying the car is the
> cheapest part the balance of the restoration costs the most money, which
> you normally never recover when you sell it.
> Even those of us that buy old models to restore and resell never make a
> lot of money, I know I have never do so, we do it for the love of the
> hobby. So restoring
> locomotives is no different, just a lot larger and you need bigger
> equipment.
>
> Kurt S. Kramke
>
>
> On 12/21/13, NW Mailing List wrote:
>
> I agree with Mr. Miller on signing posts. If you can't sign it, don't post
> it.
>
> I also agree about the monumental undertaking of restoring such
> massive machines. EVERYTHING on the railroad is heavy, and hard to
> work on. It was made that way because the railroad is such a brutal
> environment for the machines and men and women who work on it. It has
> to be built tough and beyond durable. That in itself makes for a more
> complex restoration. This is not to mention the costs, which he also
> expounded on a bit. That doesn't include the unexpected things that
> always seem to come up when restoring rail equipment, which also add
> to the time and costs.
>
> I encourage anyone who wants to be part of the solution. Many folks,
> such as myself, belong to preservation groups, historical societies,
> etc., and these groups are always short handed when it comes to
> finding help with manpower and funds. We all can always use more
> help. So please, join a group, volunteer your time and skills, and
> lend a hand.
>
> Ben Blevins
> signal maintainer and railroad preservationist
>
>
> On 12/19/13, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
> > Thanks for your insight Ken.
> >
> > I've supported restoration projects but never been able to commit the
> long
> > term enough time to work on one. I have every admiration for the many
> 000s
> > who do - including one friend from University who has done it since
> > schooldays - so that's probably 40+ years. Others I knew also made a
> > life-time commitment - to the Waterways Recovery Group who re-build whole
> > canals! As a narrowboat skipper (volunteer - that takes a fair bit of
> time)
> > and a trail walker I appreciate that work as much as steam locomotive or
> > traditional narrowboat restorers.
> >
> >
> > I thought I'd try and find some data on the preservation scene from the
> UK.
> >
> > There are many hundreds of ex British Railways locomotives, ex industrial
> > locomotives, imported
> > locomotives, locomotives withdrawn from service before the formation of
> > BR in 1948 and increasingly ‘new build’ locomotives (e.g. Tornado, and
> now
> > the new P2 locomotive 'Prince of Wales') - many restored to working
> order,
> > others awaiting restoration, some conserved against the day when
> resources
> > (people and cash) may be available to work on, and others that have been
> > cosmetically restored. Some, though not now 4472 Flying Scotsman despite
> the
> > millions it is costing, will likely never steam again even on a
> > preserved/private line. And J611 - which I will support once they sort
> out a
> > tax efficient channel for donations from the UK - is going to take some
> > financing - for the running costs, servicing etc., etc.
> >
> >
> > There are apparently a total of 387 ex ‘BR’ locomotives operating or
> > awaiting restoration based at over 115 heritage railway centres/preserved
> > lines and the National Railway Museum (York) and Locomotion (Shildon) -
> and
> > that's what has survived (some after decades of rusting in breaker's
> yards)
> > from the around 20000 steam locomotives that British Railways operated at
> > nationalisation in 1948.
> >
> > Many of the locomotives are certified for mainline running, and
> increasingly
> > preserved lines are being re-connected to the main network.
> >
> >
> > An estimated 18,500 volunteer supporters devote their own time and money
> to
> > running, maintaining or developing their railway - together with an
> employed
> > workforce - and these operate throughout the United Kingdom today with no
> > direct financial support from central or local government.
> >
> > Heritage railways make a major contribution to the economies of the areas
> > they serve both in terms of attracting tourism and of substantial
> spending
> > on local services. Research - though limited in scope - undertaken for a
> > number of railways suggests a mean benefit to the local economy of around
> > 2.7 times the railway’s turnover. In aggregate, this would suggest that
> the
> > economic benefit nationally is just under £250m.
> >
> > Add to that the major diesel, diesel-electric, electric and other
> > preservation groups, the rail charter and tour industry
> ....................
> > you've got a significant industry on top of the main freight and
> passenger
> > operators.
> >
> > Living history is invariably more attractive than static and cold
> displays
> > ....... and we should be extremely thankful for those who have made this
> > possible, and continue to do so, both the massive effort and commitment
> that
> > provides live steam and also those well-cared for and occasionally not so
> > well-cared for colder set-ups.
> >
> > Dominic
> > London
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I walked 12 miles for the Pirate Castle for the 4th time on June 22nd -
> > please help bysponsoring me
> >
> ________________________________________
> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
> ________________________________________
> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20131223/7f533b93/attachment.html>
More information about the NW-Mailing-List
mailing list