Caretta Branch - Abandoned Signal
NW Mailing List
nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
Tue Mar 4 22:11:45 EST 2014
This is the only existing signal that I am aware of. I've never explored
the area where the branch connected to the Dry Fork main track.
Jeff Hawkins
----- Original Message -----
From: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
To: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Caretta Branch - Abandoned Signal
> That is possible. How short a block are we talking about?
>
> And, is there an Approach Distant signal on up the branch, or is this
> the only signal?
>
> Ben Blevins
>
>
> On 3/4/14, NW Mailing List <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> wrote:
>> Ben,
>> Could it have been the fact that the distance from that signal and the
>> home signal was extremely short and therefore a restricting indication
>> would be safer?
>>
>> Nathan Simmons
>> trainman51 at gmail.com
>> http://www.t-51.org
>> KI4MSK
>>
>> On 3/4/2014 16:13, NW Mailing List wrote:
>>>
>>> If I knew more about how the track circuits and distant signals to
>>> this location were arranged, then I could tell you exactly why this
>>> signal was set up this way. There was a reason.
>>>
>>> The approach aspect was omitted because they did not need it. It
>>> could be as simple as that another train would never follow one out,
>>> meaning a train passing the signal would never need to "Proceed
>>> prepared to stop at next signal", as the Approach aspect dictates.
>>>
>>> Ben Blevins
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2014 2:49 PM, "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org
>>> <mailto:nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the automatic advance (or approach) signal for the home
>>> signal a
>>> short block ahead at the junction with the Dry Fork Branch. The
>>> nearby
>>> grade crossing (mostly) necessitates the short block and the
>>> signal's use
>>> as a hold-out. A Stop and Proceed here indicates a Stop and Stay
>>> at the
>>> junction, but allows movement ahead to the home signal without a
>>> violation
>>> if the rear can clear the road crossing (hold-out signals usually
>>> display
>>> Stop and Stay). In this branch line situation, with a permissive
>>> indication
>>> at the junction ahead, a Clear suffices as an Approach Diverging,
>>> making
>>> the signal act much like a repeater.
>>>
>>> Grant Carpenter
>>>
>>> > Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014
>>> >
>>> > I have a question regarding this old signal on the Caretta
>>> Branch. Does
>>> anyone know if this was the home signal for the branch's junction
>>> with the
>>> Dry Fork Branch main or a distant signal? Someone had asked me
>>> why it only
>>> had aspects for "stop" and "clear". I thought it would've had more
>>> available aspects than what it shows.
>>> >
>>> > http://www.pbase.com/railfire/image/153050851/original
>>> > http://www.pbase.com/railfire/image/154680221/original
>>> >
>>> > Jeff Hawkins
>>> >
>>> > www.railsinvirginia.com <http://www.railsinvirginia.com>
>>> > www.railfirephotography.com <http://www.railfirephotography.com>
>>> >
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org <mailto:NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org>
>>> To change your subscription go to
>>> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>>> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>>> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
>>> To change your subscription go to
>>> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
>>> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
>>> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
>>
>>
> ________________________________________
> NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org
> To change your subscription go to
> http://list.nwhs.org/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list
> Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at
> http://list.nwhs.org/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/
More information about the NW-Mailing-List
mailing list