Steel Water Tank Question

[NW Mailing List]

The water tower in Clare Yards in Cincinnati was an open top. I have photo rom above, so don't forget to model the dead birds floating on top. 
Stephen Rineair 


From: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> 
To: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> 
Cc: "NW Mailing List" <nw-mailing-list at nwhs.org> 
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 7:20:46 PM 
Subject: Re: Steel Water Tank Question 

As a follow up, an answer to my question was hinted at in the instructions to a water tank kit produced by Tichy. A short paragraph stated that some railroads “in temperate climates” didn’t install tops to their tanks. So that at least confirmed that petticoat junction-style open top steel tanks were a real thing. 
Today I also found the standard plans for the tanks in question in my original email, which confirmed the open top for the specific tanks I asked about: 
[ https://www.nwhs.org/archivesdb/detail.php?ID=13303 | https://www.nwhs.org/archivesdb/detail.php?ID=13303 ] 

The “why” question is still an open one. Possibly as simple as reducing costs, and maybe soot wasn’t an issue. 

Matt Goodman 
Columbus, Ohio, US 




On May 23, 2025, at 7:12 PM, Matt Goodman <mgoodman312 at icloud.com> wrote: 

Hey everyone, 
This past couple weeks I’ve been exploring the ODOT (Ohio Department of Transportation) Aerial Image Archive (here: [ https://gis3.dot.state.oh.us/ODOTAerialArchive/ | https://gis3.dot.state.oh.us/ODOTAerialArchive/ ] ). 

The first place I looked was the Dorney coaling station south of Columbus. The high water tank (the “raw” or untreated water) was open on top (as expected) but I was surprised to see that the two low 200K treated / storage tanks also appeared to be open. That surprised me, so I started down to check other locations. 

The nearest location with a similar set up is Portsmouth, and it too shows open tops on the treated tanks. 

To me this is unintuitive since the treated water would be exposed to soot - especially in the Portsmouth yard - which would then make its way through the locomotive appliances, etc. 

Does anyone have any comments on why this was done? Rain water harvesting? Maybe soot / cinder doesn’t really cause problems? 

Attached are Dorney (top -1959) and Portsmouth (bottom - 1954) 

<PastedGraphic-3.png> 

<PastedGraphic-1.png> 





________________________________________ 
NW-Mailing-List at nwhs.org 
To change your subscription go to 
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/options/nw-mailing-list 
Browse the NW-Mailing-List archives at 
https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist6.pair.net/pipermail/nw-mailing-list/attachments/20250526/639fa5d6/attachment.htm>