[StBernard] St. Bernard President Craig Taffaro's Response to Obama's Tuesday Address
Westley at da-parish.com
Fri Jun 18 09:19:11 EDT 2010
Joh, The issue is this:
If oil spills in Brazil, it's better for the environment (and the socialist
environmentalists in America who "runs Obama's machine") if the well (and
any other wells) if there are future leaks. Let the oil companies clean up
in South America.
Oh, yes. But tally, there are NOW 40 CZARS which are selected by OB1, but
collectively, they run their boss! (as their opinion are accepted by this
Negro president who in turn, greases their palms.
And, we're not moving to Socialism, we have been there for a century and
counting. The difference between Cuba, socialist South America and parts of
Europe is the level or degree of socialism. For one minute, we should never
believe that we are "heading" there.
It's just that there is a contest in "one-world governing" as to 100%, 75%
or 50% there--how MUCH of government is being invaded into personal
liberties of American and other countries' lives.
So, when we say, "bring back America", corrected, we should say, bring it
back to a lesser control of government over Americans lives throughout the
Unfortunately, Obama's reference to World War II and the Moon Project to
show we Americans can get things done, had nothing to do with a
determination to fix the oil leak. What Obama was really talking about was
trying to convince us that if we put our efforts to it, we can fundamentally
change the energy policy in the U.S. - in other words, use this oil spill
crisis as a spring board to pass legislation on Cap and Trade Tax (i.e.
Global Warming Tax).
If I'm wrong, then why is his answer to "why can't we stop the leak" always
along the lines of "that's why we need to get away from oil and find
alternative energy sources" even if it's going to cost each person thousands
of dollars more per year. And of course, this is all included in the Cap
and Trade Tax legislation.
I wish Obama would explain why he recently approved a $2 Billion loan to a
Brazilian deepwater offshore oil exploration company to build and drill for
deepwater oil off the coast of Brazil, which will destroy tens of thousands
of jobs along the Gulf Coast, but while he speaks from the Oval Office
telling Americans we need to get away from the use of oil???? Oh, and what
a coincidence, the Brazilian company's major owner is the George Soros, (a
foreigner) Obama's self admitted strongest economic advisor who has publicly
stated he'd like to see the American economy destroyed and move to
So let me see if I've got this straight....Obama wants to destroy the oil
industry in the United States and put hundreds of thousands of Americans in
the unemployment line, while he uses OUR tax dollars to help a FOREIGN
company owned by his socialist/communist advisor George Soros to drill for
oil off Brazil and make billions in money while creating jobs for
Brazilians? Do I have that right?
More information about the StBernard