[game_preservation] Windows 7 and Virtual PC XP
Andrew Armstrong
andrew at aarmstrong.org
Sat Jul 25 15:52:57 EDT 2009
Yeah, sounds like some interesting information since, well, I'm sure I
can get my old DOS disks working in Virtual PC or somesuch, which with
what the power is on desktops right now, should be better then DOSBox -
as it'd not emulate, but just virtualise the OS.
Shame that > Vista DOS is basically nil then. XP had no DOS really, so
it'd not be too good for that. I was more referring to XP-only items -
not that many exist, but a few games just are Vista-incompatible due to
hardcoding problems and strange workarounds.
Andrew
Dan Pinchbeck wrote:
> Hi Henry
>
> That data sounds extremely interesting - I think our emulator people may be very keen to see it - do you know if it's public, or do you have a contact?
>
> Thanks
>
> Dan
>
> Dr Dan Pinchbeck
>
> Advanced Games Research Group
> School of Creative Technologies
> University of Portsmouth, UK
>
> www.thechineseroom.co.uk
> www.keep.port.ac.uk
>
>>>> Henry Lowood <lowood at stanford.edu> 25/07/09 7:20 PM >>>
>>>>
> Devin,
>
> Not as part of the preservation project's data-gathering. It's possible
> that the RIT group is working in this area. The RIT data that I have
> seen is a qualitative grid of performance tests.
>
> Henry
>
> Devin Monnens wrote:
>
>> Henry,
>>
>> Has there been any discussion in terms of universal virtual computers
>> (UVCs) and how you can create a universal test code to determine how
>> accurately the emulator is performing in relation to the original
>> hardware?
>>
>> -Devin
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Henry Lowood <lowood at stanford.edu
>> <mailto:lowood at stanford.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> the RIT team that is part of our Library of Congress has been
>> testing not XP, but DOS compatibility, as we work on preservation
>> of DOOM (among other games). Andy Phelps from the RIT team
>> concludes, "DOSBox on Win7 is the best we can get on the modern
>> OS's." There were still issues with drivers. I'm not sure how
>> much you can conclude from this about XP, but it does address
>> early games.
>>
>> Henry
>>
>>
>> Andrew Armstrong wrote:
>>
>>> So I've pre-ordered Windows 7 so it's not rediculously-expensive,
>>> instead just man-thats-expensive. It does, it says, come with a
>>> virtual way of running apps in an XP environment (I got the Pro
>>> or whatever version, but not just for this).
>>>
>>> I was wondering, since I don't have the RC installed, does this
>>> work at all for any kind of games, or is it purely just the XP
>>> API with no real driver support? I know VirtualPC which you can
>>> run OS's off is basically like running on a stripped down box
>>> with a generic CPU, some RAM and a hard drive, but no graphics or
>>> sound support to speak of. I don't know if it is the same way of
>>> doing it, simply more built-in to the OS?
>>>
>>> I just know some games won't work with 7 (like Vista, since they
>>> run a very similar OS model), and virtulising XP might be a cure
>>> for that, but only if there is hardware support in it.
>>>
>>> I think once I research this a bit more (since as on XP now, I
>>> have very few problems running older games) I'll get digging into
>>> WINE and also emulator projects (DOSBox is obvious, others that
>>> are starting to provide hardware support or 3d emulation are
>>> worth looking at too) and might gather some resources for our
>>> list (bibliography website still pending ;) ). If anyone has a
>>> list of these it'd be welcome, before I get a new PC and slam
>>> into the ground running on Vista SP3, I mean, Windows 7 ;)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> game_preservation mailing list
>>> game_preservation at igda.org <mailto:game_preservation at igda.org>
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation
>>>
>> --
>> Henry Lowood
>> Curator for History of Science & Technology Collections;
>> Film & Media Collections
>> HRG, Green Library
>> 557 Escondido Mall, Stanford University Libraries
>> Stanford CA 94305-6004 USA
>> http://www.stanford.edu/~lowood <http://www.stanford.edu/%7Elowood>
>> lowood at stanford.edu <mailto:lowood at stanford.edu>; 650-723-4602
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> game_preservation mailing list
>> game_preservation at igda.org <mailto:game_preservation at igda.org>
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Devin Monnens
>> www.deserthat.com <http://www.deserthat.com>
>>
>> The sleep of Reason produces monsters.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> game_preservation mailing list
>> game_preservation at igda.org
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/game_preservation/attachments/20090725/c28d6f70/attachment.html>
More information about the game_preservation
mailing list