[LEAPSECS] Cheating means more planning, not less
    Rob Seaman 
    seaman at noao.edu
       
    Sun Dec 28 20:44:12 EST 2008
    
    
  
  M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Michael Sokolov writes
>
> : M. Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
> :
> : > I know that nobody is proposing rubber seconds today.
> :
> : Wrong!  I am!
>
> I don't think that's a viable thing to do.  It would play havoc with
> anything except the most low-precision timing applications.  And if
> you don't solve the problem for high-precision timing applications,
> I'm not sure that it is a viable solution.
I figured I'd grab a chance to agree wholeheartedly with Warner :-)
Just one comment.  The requirements for "timing applications" (of  
whatever precision) are distinct from the requirements for civil clock  
applications.
Rob
    
    
More information about the LEAPSECS
mailing list