[LEAPSECS] why not ITU-T?

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message <20100906164911.GA27806 at ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes:


>Is it already the case that the de facto authority over the time scale

>of the world should reside with the ITU-T rather than with the ITU-R?


So, Astronomers should Own Time, because they did it first, but
ITU-T should take time over from ITU-R because they are more recent ?

Given that ITU-T is irrellevant and has been int since they did the
OSI-protocols, I see no point...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.