[LEAPSECS] What's the point?

Mark Calabretta mcalabre at atnf.csiro.au
Wed Feb 9 19:07:09 EST 2011

On Wed 2011/02/09 10:59:39 -0000, Tony Finch wrote
in a message to: Leap Second Discussion List <leapsecs at leapsecond.com>

>Except that timezone adjustments continue to work much further into the

>future than leap seconds.

If we're seriously expected to accept the "quadratic catastrophy"
argument for immediately changing UTC, would it be too much to
expect that its replacement actually solve the problem rather
than simply delay it?

Mark Calabretta

More information about the LEAPSECS mailing list