[LEAPSECS] Crunching Bulletin B numbers (POSIX time)
igb at batten.eu.org
Sat Feb 19 17:49:25 EST 2011
On 19 Feb 2011, at 22:38, Joe Gwinn wrote:
> Not necessarily. A Rubidium clock will take a few thousand years to
> drift by a second. So, we cannot assume that isolated machines have
> drifty clocks.
I think that before conjecturing the requires of isolated machines
which have no source of leap seconds (not even manual application via
a commandline interface "leap_next_31_dec") and yet are attached to
better than 0.02ppm clocks, someone should provide an example of an
isolated machine that is attached to a 0.02ppm clock. And why
everyone else should deal with the complexity to save that one
computer the $100 bill for a GPS receiver.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LEAPSECS