[LEAPSECS] UTC going forward, one or two definitions? and what about NTP?

[mc235960]

Le 14 août 2013 à 09:07, Michael Spacefalcon a écrit :

> 

> 

> I will implement EVERY leap second which I receive from Mr. Gambis, in

> direct disobedience to any orders from the ITU to not do so, and

> regardless of whether the LS is announced through the current

> "official" channel or through a personal email account.

> 

> By a show of hands, who else on this list is with me?


 I sympathise, but I expect that if the IUT decide that to redefine UTC without leap seconds, then Dr Gambis and/or his successors will have a paragraph removed from their job descriptions and we will hear no more. 


> 

> SF

> _______________________________________________

> LEAPSECS mailing list

> LEAPSECS at leapsecond.com

> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/leapsecs/attachments/20130814/d444340f/attachment.html>