Adding additional output formats for Markdown?
Dave Pawson
dave.pawson at gmail.com
Sun Jul 24 04:46:55 EDT 2005
On 23/07/05, Fletcher T. Penney <fletcher at alumni.duke.edu> wrote:
> Like many others, I have found markdown to be useful tool. I agree
> with the core principle of having the markup look like plain human
> readable text as much as possible. This is my main reason for
> wanting to stick with Markdown as opposed to other markup formats.
>
> However, I would like to use it for more than just web pages.
> There would continue to be a single Markdown syntax, but there could
> be multiple ways of expressing the output based on individual needs.
>
> Is there anyone else who things that such a utility would be useful?
> Does anyone have something similar already? (I hate reinventing the
> wheel, as noted above...) Any thoughts about how it should work?
Yes. I've got it working for simple block level elements; nested blocks
I'm struggling with. I haven't looked at inlines as yet.
The 'syntax' is defined in a simple external text file, and is used
by the parser.
Since generate XML (to the given syntax) as an output,
I can then transform to most formats at will, from the XML, using
XSLT.
I'm currently of the opinion that most people, for 80% of the time,
need far less than XHTML has to offer. Hence catching the bulk of
the markup is probably enough.
That's the basis on which I'm working.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/java/noteparser.html
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list