Syntax Questions
Tom Humiston
tom at jumpingrock.net
Mon Jul 21 12:23:20 EDT 2008
I think the answers you're getting here will make more sense if you re-
read John Gruber's description of Markdown's history and purpose, at
daringfireball.net.
On 21 Jul 2008, at 6:32 AM, Jurgens du Toit wrote:
> I mean that "difficulty to test" must not impair the development
> process.
> Yes, sure, don't roll out software that hasn't been tested, but, as
> Markdown
> is issued under an open source license, there's who knows how many
> people
> who might want the untested functionality, and who will be willing
> to test
> it, and probably improve on it as well. Me included.
>
> J
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis at gmx.de
> >
> wrote:
>
>> * Jurgens du Toit <jurgens.dutoit at gmail.com> [2008-07-21 09:05]:
>>> I don't think that if something is difficult to test, it
>>> shouldn't be implemented.
>>
>> You mean it's fine for people to give you software that might or
>> might not work, and they don't know which? What happens if you
>> report a bug and they can't test whether their bugfix breaks
>> previously working stuff?
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
>> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jurgens du Toit
> Cell: +27 83 511 7932
> Fax: +27 86 503 2637
> Website: www.jrgns.net
>
> If people never did silly things, nothing intelligent would ever get
> done.
> - Ludwig Wittgenstein
> _______________________________________________
> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
More information about the Markdown-Discuss
mailing list