let's see what the app store says
uuf6429 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 06:00:45 EST 2011
I'm sure the world will dearly mourn the failures of markdown-based
Now go troll somewhere else, kid.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:36 PM, <Bowerbird at aol.com> wrote:
> "multimarkdown composer" has been out for 4 weeks now,
> so let's mosey on over to the app store to see what it says...
> "composer" is #184 in productivity apps, a bit disappointing,
> considering that it was in the top-20 when it first came out...
> it's gained only 5 reviews over the 18 it had right off the bat.
> perhaps even more surprising, to some, is that "marked" is
> at #356 in productivity apps, which is a solid indication that
> the editing+display coupling produced by "composer" trumps
> the use-any-text-editor-you-like generality "marked" offers.
> (note also that "marked" is even at a much lower price-point.)
> and maybe the biggest surprise of all, to some, is the newish
> "markdownnote", which appears at #115 in productivity apps.
> "markdownnote" has been available on ipad for a while, and
> is something of an enigma. its big liability is that it supports
> nothing more than gruber's flawed formulation, but its asset
> is that it has the edit-on-one-side-with-display-on-the-other
> basic interface which i consider to be vital for this type of app.
> (you might recall that fletcher disagrees with me on this point.)
> "markdownnote" pulls off this _simple_interface_ better than
> any other app i've found so far, which might well help explain
> its good ranking, as there's little else of note in its feature-set.
> one other finding of significance is that a search for "markdown"
> returns 9 app-store hits now, revealing new high price-points of
> $10 ("markdown pro"), $20 ("ulysses") and $25 ("markmywords".)
> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> Markdown-Discuss at six.pairlist.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Markdown-Discuss