[Slowhand] RE: .shn Files
Roy D. Houston
rdh at optimum-power.com
Fri Nov 14 14:46:30 EST 2003
ToeKneeF writes:
>>
I have yet to find such a significant difference in sound
quality, between .shn files and .mp3 files, to justify this additional
overhead.
<<
I definitely disagree! I have heard many shoddy MP3s - sometimes this is due to a low bit rate conversion, but even on high bitrates, the high end can sound smeary and the low end can be lacking.
With .shn files no data is lost *and* they provide a checksum file that verifies your download was glitch-free.
The quality gained is worth it, imo.
-Roy
More information about the Slowhand
mailing list