[Woodcarver] Re: Spelling

Gordon Paterson gjpat at cyberbeach.net
Sat May 8 17:11:44 EDT 2004


Hi Clive;
Now you see why we miss having the Woodbutcher this last little while, if 
he had been busy posting at his usual rate "Ben" would have been far too 
busy and have had no free time to notice your little indiscretion.(G)
Besides I think he's wrong, many woodcarver's  SWMBO's have declared 
woodcarving a vice , with that in mind and his quoted definition the, word 
woodcarving and vice surely "can" be connected.(G)

Woodbutcher oh woodbutcher where can you be, a man named Ben needs less 
time to call free!(G)


Gordon Paterson
Dowling, Ont.Can.


At 05:37 PM 5/8/04 -0300, you wrote:

>Hi all,
>I apparently made a mistake in my message, but Ben ??? was kind enough to 
>correct me and asked me to pass it on in case anyone else does the 
>same........... Ben must be a teacher or something?????
>Take care,
>Clive.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:bent at borg.com>Ben
>To: <mailto:clive at ns.sympatico.ca>clive at ns.sympatico.ca
>Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 3:33 PM
>Subject: Spelling
>
>Clive,
>
>
>Your work is great but you make the same mistake as many other
>carvers do.   The thing that holds your piece of wood in place
>while you are carving is a VISE, not a vice.
>
>A vice is defined as: 1 a) an evil action or habit  b) evil conduct
>                                      2 a trivial fault or failing
>
>Wood carving does not fall into any of the above catagories.
>Therefore, it should not be connected to a vice.
>
>Feel free to pass this on when you notice the error, it is very common.
>
>Thanks
>Ben, another carver..
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/woodcarver/attachments/20040508/5fd6708e/attachment.htm


More information about the Woodcarver mailing list